Today is
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice." -Bill Cosby
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Two Abortion Rulings
"Allowing a physician to destroy a child as long as one toe remains within the mother would place society on the path towards condoning infanticide. . . "I find the current expansion of the right to terminate a pregnancy to cover a child in the process of being born morally, ethically and legally unacceptable."
One of the prevailing judges on that court felt duty bound to strike the law down even though he found the "procedure" to be "gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized."
You can find National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales here.
HT: Drudge.
4 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
I wonder how the "mother's" health is preserved by killing a baby just prior to birth and then delivering it. I thought the usual and accepted method was a cesarean section. And why do they call these women "mothers" when they are doing all they can to not become mothers?
- Wonderdog said...
-
CIV, we all know the "health" of the mother includes her mental well-being as well. If having a child would result in the slightest bit of emotional distress (i.e. "how will I ever be able to afford all those diapers?") then it is her Constitutional right to crush his or her skull.
As one who has studied Constitutional Law and has read case upon case strike down statues for their ambiguity, how on earth does the ambiguous provision "to protect the health of the mother" pass Constitutional muster?
As I've said before, reasonable people can disagree about the right to an abortion during the initial stages of pregnancy, but only the radical extremists in our society find it acceptable under these circumstances. - Wonderdog said...
-
Yes, I meant statutes not statues.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Good thing you clarified, or we'd run out of monuments here in Wash, DC.
Funny that someone might feel distress in having a baby born alive, but not dead. Weird, actually. Hard to believe anyone defends partial birth abortion even in the 9th month.
A local radio station here has been running ads for Second Look. First time I've EVER heard a pro-life radio ad. They're pretty tame, but that's probably how they got on the air.
Monday, January 30, 2006
Done Deal
Kerry, Kennedy, and the Krazy Klan have played to their base, but in doing so have pushed themselves further out on the fringe.
72-25. Hugh checks in on it.
There Is A Timeout On The Field. . .
Rumpus Riddle Answer #12
An hourglass.
3 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
An Hourglass!
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Wait just a minute. Does this mean you are no longer tracking answers and posting winners? Bah, humbug.
On the other hand, not having to wait until a baby is born and weaned before getting the correct answer does have its advantages. - Scotty said...
-
Not weaned...just until he started solids. Well...a little while after he started solids. Okay, okay, a few MONTHS after he started solids.
And don't worry, I'll still post the answer when the riddle changes. I'll even try to change it BEFORE the littlest Wonderpup has his 1st birthday!
Creepiness continues
Yes, there is a toy in there that plays that wretched song in electronic children's voices. Yes, we have a cat. Yes, he could have tripped it. But the goosebumps on my neck are still hanging around and having a confab.
There's a brood of possessed schoolchildren in there. I just know it. I'm bracing myself for a haunting rendition of "London Bridge".
Oh the horror. The horror.
3 Comments:
- Scotty said...
-
Hey Wonderdog, you should hear the fire engine's sirens go off in there when the kids are asleep and the cats purring on your lap!
- stewdog said...
-
"Calling Father Karras. . Father Damian Karras, please pick up line 1."
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Hey, I once woke up in the middle of the night hearing something almost beyond the range of hearing. Very unreal. But I got up to investigate, good parent that I am, and discovered...
the baby's head butted up against the big push button on the crib's mirror toy. An electronic "Twinkle twinkle little star" played over and over and over only waking me.
After that, I always flipped the mirror to the outside of the crib at night, thus defeating its purpose of entertaining baby while parents try to sleep in.
Sunday, January 29, 2006
"Crazy world. They outta sell tickets. Shoot, I'd buy one."
Five months earlier, Miss Dinoire's features were destroyed when her Labrador savaged her while she was unconscious after a drug overdose. Her face was left a patchwork of torn flesh and exposed bone so shocking that one of her two teenage daughters refused to look at her.
Her own Labrador? That's one creepy-ass dog, dude. Suddenly, I'm having visions of that Rottweiler in The Omen.
I grew up with dogs (mostly German Shepherds) and have slept beside them many a time and I'll tell you this with complete honesty; never for a nanosecond would I have ever dreamed that one of them would rip my face off whilst I lay unconscious beside them.
In the parlance of our times, what is up with that?
One more thing. Setting aside the obvious shot I could take at the "drug overdose", did I read correctly that her daughter refused to look at her? Nice. I mean, maybe it would be one thing if she simply "couldn't bear" to look at her but to just flat out "refuse"?
Maybe that daughter is the demon spawn that that hound from hell was protecting.
2 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
C'mon WD. Give the dog a break. Do we know what she was doing during her last conscious drugged out minutes before passing out? Hell, maybe the dog attached her while she was awake, but she doesn't remember or doesn't want to say what was going on. And maybe the daughter has other reasons for "refusing" to look at her druggie mom. Let's not rush to judgment here.
- Wonderdog said...
-
You're right, CIV. Perhaps this is a rush to judgment. If the maul was legit, we must acquit!
Lyric of the Day
Dear ABC (and CBS and NBC too)
2 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
Okay, so it wasn't just me; I had the same reaction an hour ago when the injured-journalists story was the top story on our 11 p.m. local newscast. Like you, I certainly mean no disrespect to the injured journalists when I say that something about the coverage was a bit unseemly.
- stewdog said...
-
OK, the good news is that I'm not a solitary unfeeling clod. The bad news is Jeff is thinking the same way as I, and I recommend that he seek help immediately.
Saturday, January 28, 2006
Something worthwhile from The Los Angeles Times
1 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
What a story. Get out your handkerchiefs.
Who let that get into a liberal rag? Will someone get fired?
The littlest Bag End
(Via Unlocked Wordhoard)
*Yes, that's a reference to one of my least favorite scenes in The Return of the King -- least favorite for all sorts of reasons, but partly because it seemed like it was ripped off from Mulan, and partly because it didn't recognize a distinction between what Frodo and Sam did and what Merry and Pippin did.
Friday, January 27, 2006
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Mindset List
What Rumpus and Molly Ivins Have In Common
Lyric Of The Day
HELPLESSLY HOPING
Helplessly hoping
Her harlequin hovers nearby
Awaiting a word
Gasping at glimpses
Of gentle true spirit
He runs, wishing he could fly
Only to trip at the sound of good-bye
Wordlessly watching
He waits by the window
And wonders
At the empty place inside
Heartlessly helping himself to her bad dreams
He worries
Did he hear a good-bye?
Or even hello?
They are one person
They are two alone
They are three together
They are for each other
Stand by the stairway
You'll see something
Certain to tell you confusion has its cost
Love isn't lying
It's loose in a lady who lingers
Saying she is lost
And choking on hello
They are one person
They are two alone
They are three together
They are for each other
I can't get to sleep ...
"Give to me your leather ...
Take from me ... my lace."
Sometimes I think I might have done some good in this world if I hadn't listened to pop songs in the 80's. By the time that memorable decade began, my mind was already cluttered with the pop culture ephemera of my formative years. Mom always said, "Don't play ball in the house." Dick York or Dick Sargent? Babaloooo! Babalooo-aiiii-ayyyy! Richie the "C." Hello, Angels! De Plane! De Plane! Good night, Johnboy. Little Buddy. That Afterschool special about the bed-wetter with Lance Kerwin. [Click on that last link at your own risk. It's technically work safe, but your coworkers will look at you real funny.]
But why didn't I just stop there, and leave a little room in my brain for something worthwhile? I have never read Don Quixote, but when we went out for Chinese last night, and that inane Stevie Nicks song started playing, I found I could sing along with the whole accursed thing. And when the girls, my sister, and I browsed at Pottery Barn last week, I absentmindedly sang along with all the songs in the Pottery Barn '80's mix. My four-year-old danced her way through Come On, Eileen, Overkill, and Ain't Nothing Gonna Break My Stride. When I laughed at her and called her a little nut, she said, "I can't stop dancing." [I was *not* letting her disturb other customers. Don't want you to think I'm one of those parents.]
I know how she feels. As it turns out, I can't stop dancing either. I never learned the names of trees and plants and flowers. I never road in the ice truck with Mr. Nealy, or found a litter of kittens up in the hayloft at Unlce Henry's farm. I've never been to a soda shop. The first time I ever saw a firefly, I was a grown woman, and of the few times I've been on a fishing trip, about half were at man-made lakes. If pressed, though, I could probably remember the names of all the actresses who played Charlie's Angels. The sad thing is that it's precisely the flotsam and jetsam of the popular culture that forms my strongest link with my generational past. Or maybe I just think it's sad when it's simply inevitable. If I want to create a bond, or establish my cultural bona fides, with a member of my generation, I usually do it by trading catch phrases and song lyrics and movie quotes. Even people whom I find in other respects insufferable will throw a casual reference to the Sleestaks into the conversation and cause me, if only momentarily, to reconsider first impressions. Sure, Marshall, Will, and Holly are kitschy and fun, but shouldn't the shibboleths of our common culture be more significant, more sublime? Probably not; after all, shibboleths are about pronunciation, not meaning.
But still.
When I was in graduate school, I went with Sadeeq, Madman of Chu, and another friend to see The Real Live Brady Bunch. The show was a verbatim reenactment of an episode of The Brady Bunch (it was the "Oh, my nose!" episode, I think). The actors and actresses camped it up only slightly, and, while the audience certainly appreciated the cheese value of the whole thing, its affection for the show outdistanced its typically cynical and reflexively postmodern pose. In the end, we sang along with the music and shouted out the lines, not with a sneer on our faces, but with love in our hearts -- love that encompassed an affection for our individual pasts, an acknowledgment of vanished innocence, and a kind of gratitude that we had something, anything, to bring us all together. It's the closest we were ever going to get, as a generation, to the Book of Common Prayer.
And that's what's kind of sad about it.
11 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Poor KM. At least your head isn't full of leisure suits and disco songs -- or do-rags and hip hop or rap.
Still, my "baby" never went fishing, probably doesn't remember planting a garden (though I blame the deer for that), never went camping out (because I was never fond of it), and only experienced a farm via a day camp. All the memories of this generation will be on-line. They'll be trading Google and iPod stories when they're in the home. Or maybe they'll just upload their brains and live IN the internet.
Actually, these cultural differences are why I don't understand how marriages of people more than a couple years apart work. I don't grok most of your references and you probably wouldn't know most of mine.
[Hey, Stewdog, do you remember: It's about time. It's about space. About 2 men in the strangest place.] - Kate Marie said...
-
Don't mind me, CIV. I was just tired and rambling last night. I thought about deleting the whole mess, but what's a blog for if not self-indulgence?
I guess I partly wish that there was a little more grandeur (spiritual or aesthetic) to the culture that links me with others of my generation.
By the way, a bridge between generations isn't hopeless. I grokked your "grok" reference, I think. - stewdog said...
-
Hey, KM, I loved this post. I actually understood it.
"Give to me your leather, take from me my lace" is actually a song of barter. The girl likes the guy's wallet and he appreciates the doileys on her divan and easy chair, hence the swap. The IRS, by the way, would consider this a taxable event.
And to CIV, I sure do remember that short lived show about the lost astronauts, It's About Time. - Jeff said...
-
KM, I understand this concern well. Last night, I taught my first medieval lit class of the semester, but even though I've lived with the material for years--and this is the fifth time I've taught this course in seven years--I found myself working to remember stuff that should be basic to me, such as where certain kings and scholars fell on an approximate timeline.
In the end, the lecture came together well, but I'm deeply bothered by the realization that it takes time and effort to open the little mental compartment where I store the important cultural and historical knowledge I've accumulated as an adult, even though I can instantaneously recall the lyrics to some crappy song that was on the charts for two weeks in 1986. I can't really claim the "high culture" as my own, but I also can't deny the "pop culture" upbringing that still helps me relate so well to my students. It's a strange thing to be stuck in the middle. - stewdog said...
-
And to further illustrate the point, the last sentence triggered this song in my mind "Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you". We just grew up with music as a soundtrack of life.
- Jeff said...
-
Ha! I'm actually wondering if KM's post title, "I can't get to sleep," was supposed to make one of us add: "...I think about the implications..."
- stewdog said...
-
". . cuz I was tossin' and turnin'. . tossin' and turnin' all night"
- Kate Marie said...
-
Bingo, Jeff! I was wondering whether anyone would come up with the "implications" of my post title.
It *is* strange to be stuck in the middle, and I don't want to deny the pop culture that I grew up with -- I have an affection for it. I just wish that there were still aspects of "high culture" that were part of the common culture, but maybe it never really was that way.
Anyway, you're way ahead of me in the high culture hierarchy, Jeff. I could benefit from one of your lectures.
Stewdog, this may be a generational thing, too, but when I hear that song (Stuck in the Middle), a very unpleasant image comes to mind. Anyone? Anyone? - stewdog said...
-
"Anyone. . anyone. . Bueller. . Bueller. . .Bueller. Got me. It is an old song by Stealer's Wheel. I think it may have been featured in some Yucky movie that I haven't seen, such as Resevoir Dogs, but I can imagine that KM saw that.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
KM, you can at least try to correct things for your little Princesses.
We do not watch TV. The "culture" at our home, at least, is high tech and classical music. I sneak in some "oldies" -- older than yours -- and the youngster complains of only knowing music "30 years or 300 years old," but guess what I find in the iPod? Classical music and Beatles. And we're talking about HS age (and not a social misfit).
I suppose you could ask Sadeeq and the Dogs to take the Princesses fishing, but that seems like a pointless skill when we know that global warming is going to kill all the fish. - said...
-
I'm glad there are others that consider 80's pop culture and music high society. Music forms the tapestry of our lives, it may be cliche, bit I can recall the way I felt at a certain time by obsessing over lyrics I identified with, or a song that happened to be playing. I seem to have lost touch with that part of myself that was searching for something to identify with, and it's fun to recapture it at times.
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Grandmother's Engagement Ring
The Early Polls Are Encouraging
Out and About in the Blogosphere
* How should we address professors? Show a little respect, says the good Dr. Nokes. I agree.
* Meanwhile, Professor Drout is dissing binaries: "The New Criticism's tedious 'ambiguity this, ambiguity that' is just as boring as the 'polyvalent this, polyvalent that' or the 'ooh, look. A binary! Let's deconstruct it! for the one millionth time!' approaches of the post-structuralists." How dare he?!!
* Via Dr. Nokes's blog roll, I've recently discovered the joy of The Joy of Curmudgeonry. Check it out and indulge the curmudgeon in you.
More useless idiots
Here's a sample of Hugh Hewitt's on-air interview with Stein:
HH: All right. Now who is your...this is a column about the troops that begins, "I don't support our troops." We'll get to the specifics in a second. But who is your closest family member or friend who is on active duty?
JS: That's an excellent question. I wouldn't say I have a very close friend. I would say only acquaintances. No family at all.
HH: Who are your acquaintances?
JS: There was a guy who works at Time, that's where I worked last, who quit to serve in the military.
HH: What's his name?
JS: (pause) You know, I'm blanking on his name. But your point is well taken that I don't have many people that I even know who are in the military.
HH: Do you have any, though, other than this guy at Time whose name you can't remember?
JS: Who are serving currently?
HH: Yeah.
JS: Or ever served?
HH: No, serving currently.
JS: Or only in Iraq?
HH: Active duty. Anywhere in the world.
JS: (pause) I'd say I've been pretty isolated from that. I mean, that's a point I made in the column.
The entire transcript and audio is up at Radio Blogger.
2 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Wow. That was some interview. What a dope.
- stewdog said...
-
I glance over his stupid article and then saw if featured in Drudge and looked at it again. It is just a vapid little piece of attention demanding drivel.
But one thing I have noticed. . on the News Hour on PBS when they have their honor roll of the dead from "over there", they all seem to be kids from small towns in the red states who are fighting. Not a lot of Berkeley, Santa Monica, Santa Cruz casualties there.
Quote of the Day
-- Letters of Flannery O'Connor: The Habit of Being
4 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Huh? Who determines what is determined and what is undetermined. Who makes that determination? Is it a matter of consensual validation, or is is a product of structural functionalism? The real mystery is where has my knowlege evaporated to, and can I use that preposition to end that clause? I think this Flannery guy has joined me in going the Leonard Tose route!
- Kate Marie said...
-
That's Flannery GAL to you, bub.
- stewdog said...
-
Well excuuuuuuuussseee me, Sinead.
- Kate Marie said...
-
I have now shaved my head, and I'm braying some tuneless song while tearing up a picture of you in a Pope hat.
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Poem of the Day
This living hand, now warm and capable
Of earnest grasping, would, if it were cold
And in the icy silence of the tomb,
So haunt thy days and chill thy dreaming nights
That thou wouldst wish thine own heart dry of blood
So in my veins red life might stream again,
And thou be conscience-calmed—see here it is—
I hold it towards you.
John Keats
13 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Ugh. That's sounds vaguely creepy.
- stewdog said...
-
Is Living Hand a cousin or Justice Learned Hand? Just wondering.
- Kate Marie said...
-
I wonder how Keats would have reacted to the prospecct of his very own peanut gallery?
- stewdog said...
-
Keats me!
- Jeff said...
-
I wonder if Tom Lehrer was thinking of this poem when he wrote his song "I Hold Your Hand in Mine"?
- stewdog said...
-
I think he is describing The Hand That Rocks The Cradle well in advance of the invention of film. Very prescient.
- Kate Marie said...
-
Daryl Ann, I think my favorite is "The Eve of Saint Agnes." Leave it to you to fall in love with dead poets, though -- I saved my love for fictional characters. At least they're still alive.
Jeff, who on earth is that and are you a big fan? The song *was* kinda funny. - Jeff said...
-
Tom Lehrer was a Harvard mathematician who had a brief career as a piano-playing comedian during the late 1950s/early 1960s. He put out three or four albums before returning to academia. (At the time, he was considered a bit risque; now, his humor seems witty and sophisticated.) I think he still teaches somewhere in California.
If you ever saw the 1970s kids' show "Electric Company" on PBS, you may have heard a couple of his songs for children: "Silent E" or "-ly." - Kate Marie said...
-
Oh, my gosh, I remember both those songs!
- Kate Marie said...
-
Funny how what's considered risque for one generation gets reclassified as witty for another. Maybe Wedding Crashers will be considered a witty and urbane comedy at mid-century, and then I won't feel slightly guilty for having laughed at it.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
KM, you're giving your (young) age away saying you know Electric Company but not Tom Lehrer. Bet you don't know Phil Ochs, either. Tsk tsk.
- Kate Marie said...
-
CIV, I'm old enough to be happy to be accused of being young ...
- stewdog said...
-
I remember Phil Ochs, but I'm sure that wouldn't interest anybody, outside of a small circle of friends.
Monday, January 23, 2006
Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto!
Update: Video here.
Canada to make right turn; Moore to binge
Hide the Hostess donuts. Mr. Moore will binging again to help get through yet another conservative election victory.
Today's Propaganda Quiz
Daylight Come. . .
Meanwhile, Harry is busy playing "The N Card", the modern day last refuge of scoundrels.
3 Comments:
- Wonderdog said...
-
That cat bears a striking resemblance to WD and Scotty's "Jinx" here at home. For a second, my heart had hope that someone had finally taken him off our hands.
- Jeff said...
-
By comparing DHS to the Gestapo, Harry B. is giving our government far more credit for efficiency and effectiveness than it deserves.
If I were a Hollywood agent, I'd warn my clients to be careful about what they say--not because the government might punish them, but because in the past five years, the press has moved from reporting celebrity political rants as newsworthy to gleefully reporting them for their absurd entertainment value. I don't think most celebrities have noticed the change. - stewdog said...
-
Harry B has. . ah. . gone the Leonard Tose Route.
Friday, January 20, 2006
Pink shenanigans
3 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Wonderdog, if you are going to mention CS, that is "Saint Cindy, Mother Cindy, or Our Lady Of Casey". HOW DARE YOU!
Then again, there is something to like about Code Pink. Their website features this diatribe and directive regarding Clinton Lite:
"Bird-Dog Hillary!
The American people are saying, ‘Troops out,’ Iraqi people are saying, ‘Troops out.’ Are you listening, Hillary? CODEPINK has launched a nationwide campaign against Hillary Clinton because of her opposition to immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq. We plan to tail the senator around the state and the country to persuade her to oppose the war. Our protests in Chicago, Washington D.C, and New York have generated a buzz in the media." - Kate Marie said...
-
That is despicable and laughable at the same time. What was with the photo-shopping? They wanted her to be smiling? And then they changed the photo after the entire blogosphere had seen the original? Oy.
- Wonderdog said...
-
Forgive me, Stewdog -- Our Lady of Perpetual Protests. How's that?
As for the Hillary pillorying, I have my suspicions. I truly believe that there is a vast left wing conspiracy to make Ms. Rodham appear as centrist as possible to get her elected and that certain fringe leftist organizations are doing their part to conjure that image.
KM, don't know what was up with the photo-shopping. It's just bizarre, weird and typical freakishness from the far left. I think maybe that's Streisand's mouth.
What's the matter with Democrats?
There's a slight rift on the right about this issue, because Republican libertarianism is also implicated in Douthat's and Franke-Ruta's analysis. I'm siding more and more with the Cruncy Cons in my old age.
5 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
This post has be remembering a comment that I think was posted by Jeff a while back. Voters don't necessarily pull the lever for Republicans because they embrace the candidate or his or her platform so much as the alternative is just so repulsive, time and again.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
shopping at agriculture co-ops and rejecting suburban sprawl
Ugh. If that's crunchy, make mine smooth and creamy. Give me Costco and give me a big yard. - Conservative in Virginia said...
-
This is off topic, but necessary:
Scotty, the riddle's "submit" button just returned a "Proxy Error." Also, please check the Rumpus mailbag. Thanks. - Wonderdog said...
-
CIV, per Scotty, she got the email. We're gonna post that on the blog. Thanks!
She's gonna fix the Rumpus Riddle glitch but...why on earth are you submitting an answer to that riddle that's been there many a blue moon? - Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Hey, WD, I like to win!
Actually, I sometimes use that riddle space to secretly contact the elusive Scotty. Oops. That was our secret.
Say "hey" to Scotty for me. Hope she and the pups are doing well.
That Lucky CIV
4 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
Disregard that "Huh." I put it up before the rest of your post was published, I guess.
Yes, C.I.V *and* Jeff. Here's your chance to turn your outrage into mass political action. - stewdog said...
-
Yes, and Jeff and Toto too! Didn't mean to forget his invitation to this scream fest. Perhaps if he went by "Jeff in DC" I wouldn't have missed it.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Hey, hey, CIA! Victory to MPLA!
Wait, are they still in business? Hmmm. Not sure. Wait! I know:
Hey, hey, LBJ.How many kids did you kill today?
The people. United. Will never be defeated.
Now where's my bandanna? Or would a Che beret be better? And where did I put that little Red book? Far out, man!
Stewdog, I'll pick you up at Ronald Reagan Facist National airport by the Amerikkkan Airline counter. - stewdog said...
-
That's the spirit CIV.
1 2 3 4 We don't want your stupid war.
5 6 7 8 Birkinstocks and Volvos. . .GREAT!
Cue to Joan Baez:
"I dreamed I saw
Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
Said I to Joe
You're 10 years dead
Just Like I wish Cheney."
2 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
She even suggested that Bush hold some kind of talk with the man behind 9/11.
That's a great idea. Osama, just give President Bush a call. Maybe use a satellite phone and talk a really, really long time. - stewdog said...
-
The suggestion that Bush and Bin Laden stand on equal footing in this situation is just laughable.
Another Reason To Dislike George Clooney
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Shocking, Just Shocking!
Meanwhile, Clinton Lite comes out swinging and criticizes the Administration for downplaying the threat of Iran. It must be exhausting being Hilary. Stading for nothing, checking which way the wind blows everyday, and letting the polls and politics dictate every statement.
1 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
I have figured out that once you pass 30, you enter The Years Of Napping Dangerously.
Neither Barry nor Johnson
2 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Wow, tonight is really a blast from the past. Who'd a thunk ol' Lyndon was still alive? I wonder if he's still living in Virginia?
Many moons ago during the dark days of malaise, I got a leaflet from one of his zombies. It said, in all seriousness, that President Carter (it pains me to pair those words) had a secret plan to bomb... America! Yes, Carter was going to bomb half of the USA (unhelpfully, it didn't say which half) in order to solve the energy, population, and unemployment problems.
I take it that we are only here today because Lyndon saved us all by exposing Carter's nasty plans. - stewdog said...
-
JC had to settle on bombing our Olympic Athletes. That one still sticks in my craw. If Carter had been our president in '36, Jesse Owens never would have been able to show up the Third Reich and expose the Nazi's sick racial theories of white surpremecy for the hideous crap that it was!
Nihil sub sole novum
I'll read the book anyway, of course. As Richard Scott Nokes points out, a story that follows a well-trodden narrative path is as likely to be a very good story as it is to be a bad one. There aren't many really new stories in the world, but so what? The old ones -- many-hued, sinuous, shape-shifting -- have stood me in good stead all these years.
Who, for instance, among those who survived the first twenty minutes or so of Moulin Rouge!, didn't know how the story was going to end? I was undaunted by knowing the ending, because I was still curious about how the story was going to make me care about the ending. That's something that always happens -- if it happens at all -- along the way, and it is along the way that the really good stories, however old, become new again.
8 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Ha-rumph. Tell me you knew you'd see the Statue of Liberty at the end of Planet of the Apes.
- stewdog said...
-
This is great. KM gives away the Kite Runner and Moulon Rouge, adn then CIV gives away Planet Of The Apes. I guess I need to read books and watch movies when they first come out.
- Kate Marie said...
-
CIV, of *course* I didn't know I'd see the Statue of Liberty at the end of the Planet of the Apes, but then ... I was only a child when I first saw it. I'd like to think that, nowadays, I'd have guessed the general outline of the ending at least from the moment that doll said "Mama!" But that was a great ending, wasn't it? G-d them! They did it! They finally did it!
You'll notice I was careful not to give anything away, Stewdog. And are you yanking my chain, or have you really never seen Planet of the Apes? - stewdog said...
-
I'm just monkeying around with you.
- Kate Marie said...
-
In that case ...
Get your stinking hands off me, you damned dirty ape! - Kate Marie said...
-
Excuse me ... that should read "paws," not "hands."
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Hey, I did guess the end of Soylent Green. It was near the end, but still I felt proud of my self. (OK, so I lived a sad little life as a teenager.)
- stewdog said...
-
I don't want to know how The Crying Game Ends.
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Poem of the Day
The day dawns with scent of must and rain,
Of opened soil, dark trees, dry bedroom air.
Under the fading lamp, half dressed, -- my brain
Idling on some compulsive fantasy --
I towel my shaven lip and stop, and stare,
Riveted by a dark exhausted eye,
A dry downturning mouth.
It seems again that it is time to learn,
In this untiring, crumbling place of growth
To which, for the time being, I return.
Now plainly in the mirror of my soul
I read that I have looked my last on youth
And little more; for they are not made whole
That reach the age of Christ.
Below my window the awakening trees,
Hacked clean for better bearing, stand defaced
Suffering their brute necessities,
And how should the flesh not quail that span for span
Is mutilated more? In slow distaste
I fold my towel with what grace I can,
Not young and not renewable, but man.
-- Thomas Kinsella
2 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Thanks for the reminder. . .must purchase Edge Shaving Gel and prune the trees.
- stewdog said...
-
OOPS. . my pledge not to make fun of KM's poetry postings lasted all of 18 days into the new year. Oh well, now that the seal is broken, I should just have at it.
NIHIL STEWDOG ET QUORUM HABITAS EST DELECTIBUS DECORUM NON DEBILIO
The Marriage Gap
For one thing, women who grow up in a marriage-before-children culture organize their lives around a meaningful and beneficial life script. Traditional marriage gives young people a map of life that takes them step by step from childhood to adolescence to college or other work training—which might well include postgraduate education—to the workplace, to marriage, and only then to childbearing. A marriage orientation also requires a young woman to consider the question of what man will become her husband and the father of her children as a major, if not the major, decision of her life. In other words, a marriage orientation demands that a woman keep her eye on the future, that she go through life with deliberation, and that she use self-discipline—especially when it comes to sex: bourgeois women still consider premature pregnancy a disaster. In short, a marriage orientation—not just marriage itself—is part and parcel of her bourgeois ambition.
When Americans announced that marriage before childbearing was optional, low-income women didn’t merely lose a steadfast partner, a second income, or a trusted babysitter, as the strength-in-numbers theory would have it. They lost a traditional arrangement that reinforced precisely the qualities that they-and their men; let’s not forget the men!—needed for upward mobility, qualities all the more important in a tough new knowledge economy. The timing could hardly have been worse. At a time when education was becoming crucial to middle-class status, the disadvantaged lost a reliable life script, a way of organizing their early lives that would prize education and culminate in childbearing only after job training and marriage. They lost one of their few institutional supports for planning ahead and taking control of their lives.
Worst of all, when Americans made marriage optional, low-income women lost a culture that told them the truth about what was best for their children. A number of researchers argue that, in fact, low-income women really do want to marry. They have “white picket dreams,” say Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas in Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage, and though the men in their lives cannot turn those dreams into reality, they continue to gaze longingly into the distance at marriage as a symbol of middle-class stability and comfort. What they don’t have, however, is a clue about the very fact that orders the lives of their more fortunate peers: marriage and childbearing belong together. The result is separate and unequal families, now and as far as the eye can see.
Read the whole thing.
1 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Good piece, KM... even though I had to google the Latin at the end.
I haven't used any Latin since 2nd or 3rd grade. Even then, I only knew how to mumble the minimum for Mass. The nuns didn't seem to think we needed to actually know what we were saying.
There's that darned double standard again
"This city will remain mostly white because that's the way God wants it to be."
How long after making such imbecilic remarks would the white politician who made them have before he was forced to make his resignation speech? An hour? Maybe two? And rightly so.
So why is it different when it's a black politician saying the opposite? The answer is as racial as the remarks themselves -- because he's black.
I loved this attempt to cover his assinine comments:
"I want everyone to be welcome in New Orleans -- black, white, Asian, everybody,"
You know, blacks, whites...them asian types with the squinty eyes. Everyone.
Hispanics best stay out of town just to be safe.
4 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
Hey, Wonderdog! Put your feet up. Stay a while.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
WD, Nagin later explained, “How do you make chocolate? You take dark chocolate, you mix it with white milk and it becomes a delicious drink. That is the chocolate I am talking about.”
So maybe Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, et al are the nutmeg on top? - stewdog said...
-
I'm the marshmello
- Kate Marie said...
-
Hilarious, CIV. So he was just a little imprecise -- he really meant he wants New Orleans to be a milk chocolate city again.
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
From the "too cool to make an argument" files
3 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Those Modern Language people are obviously all Bush haters who believe everything MoveOn tells them.
- Jeff said...
-
Dorfman writes:
The sadder truth is that I can imagine an epilogue to my story.
The United States is hit by an even more devastating and lethal terrorist attack.
On that day, can I confidently say that there will not be a knock at my door and that two men, one tall and gangly, the other short and beefy, will not ask me if I recall spreading lies about their efforts to fight the war on terrorism? And that they will not demand that I accompany them, just for a few hours, for some routine questioning?
I can confidently say it: If and when there is another massive attack by Islamic terrorists, Argentinian-born academics and novelists won't exactly be the government's highest priority. Talk about ego... - Kate Marie said...
-
It's really kind of mind-boggling, isn't it?
Significant SCOTUS Ruling
Those Wacky Dems!
2 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
That TK thing is hilarious. My favorite quote was "I'm not a member; I continue to pay $100 ..."
- stewdog said...
-
You gotta love Ted. On a slow Dem bashing day, he will always give you some material. He's just classic.
4 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
I saw that. This guy is beyond being a king jerk.
On another note, I caught the end of San Fran Nan's town hall meeting on CSPAN. I thougt I was watching the House of Commons, with anti war freaks yelling throughout. . You reap what you so, Ms. Pelosi. - Jeff said...
-
The weirdest thing about the UK "Big Brother" is that it's on the BBC all the time. It airs several hours a day, even if the housemates are doing nothing, but each day is also recapped by a host before a live studio audience each night and by the folks on the morning chat shows the next day, plus by the print media.
The Brits should be awfully glad that such drivel (which makes our own reality series seem like Shakespeare by comparison) doesn't get shown on BBC outlets worldwide; the world would have an entirely different and much less complimentary set of stereotypes about them. - Kate Marie said...
-
Jeff, I had no idea Big Brother was that huge in the UK. Maybe I shouldn't have scoffed at Galloway's spokesman's suggestion that he went on the show to get his political message across. I guess I *was* overestimating the Brits in a complimentary way.
- Jeff said...
-
I think most Americans are inclined to overestimate Brits in a complimentary way. They're lucky we do! A few weeks of unfiltered British television would convince most Americans of the sad truth of much of what Theodore Dalrymple writes.
I never thought I'd say this, but after my visit to the UK last year, I can state that I feel much safer and more comfortable in New York City or D.C. at night than I generally did in London, Cambridge, or Canterbury during the day. It's not that there was anything in particular I can point to, but there was just an eerie feeling about those cities. Unfortunately, it was familiar: It reminded me of the weird, feral feeling of many American cities during the late 1970s. The Brits do have some bad times ahead.
Overheard while watching Star Wars with a 4-year-old
* "That water is. So. Gross."
* "That's not a walking carpet. That's Chewbacca!" [accompanied by uncontrollable giggling]
* "Why does Obi Wan disappear?"
* "Does Han care?"
* "He shouldn't be saying 'Yeaaahhhh!' He should be saying, like, 'Noooooooooo!'"
By the way, I hereby disclaim any responsibility for the "like, [quote]" construction. I may be a native Southern Californian, but I'm from the other valley. And while the girls are movie watchers -- they're usually allowed one a night -- they do not watch commercial television at our house. I suspect that the Disney Channel, which they get to watch when they are with their adoring and indulgent grandparents, is the culprit. I think Disney is also behind the "Yeah, girl!" which sometimes punctuates the triumph of winning a race or getting their way. At least neither of them has begun that peculiar uptalk which is the mark of the true Valley Girl and the annoying affectation of all Valley Girl wannabes. I'm being unfair to the wannabes, though, since the original mode of conversation was already an affectation.
Can you imagine Princess Leia as a Valley Girl? "Help me, Obi Wan Kenobi? You're, like, my only hope?"
1 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
And what, like, pray tell is WRONG with a Valley Girl? I, like, raised two of them, like you know and they are totally cool.
Monday, January 16, 2006
Monday Musings
On a lighter note, the Times posed the question to many in LA about how they would improve our fair city. I really like Sandra Tsing Loh and got a kick out of her comment:
"L.A.'s most sought-after private schools (ones that teach such estimable values as peaceful conflict resolution, global citizenship and honoring diversity) now cost $15,000 to $20,000 a year. If just 35 L.A. private school kindergarteners braved the wilds of public kindergarten for one year, the saved tuition money could be used to support Access Books, a nonprofit that provides books to underfunded L.A.-area schools. Because this outside-the-box approach provides such a fresh twist onthe community service line in the Harvard application, I think this one-year "Outward Bound From Private School Kindergarten" program could be a win/win."
Sunday, January 15, 2006
San Fran Nan
Powerful Catholics or the power of Catholicism?
(Via Amy Welborn)
Morning Musings
Took a gander on an Aussie wine last night and am going back for a case tody. Rosemount Orange Vineyard Shiraz 2001. It's a 20 dollar wine you can get at Bevmo for 10 if you have one of their cards. A real treat, this, mate.
Read a blurb in the sports page that mentioned Laura Nyro. She died young of cancer, but was a prolific songwriter who has to go in the 'underrated' column. She was a good performer, but her strength was in songwriting. Some of the songs she wrote that you may know include Eli's Coming, Wedding Bell Blues, Flim Flam Man, Blowin' Away, Stoney End, And When I Die, Stoned Soul Picnic, and Save The Country.
That's it folks. Out for my workout and then time to chip away at Mr. 1040 while watching some football today.
2 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
I hereby dub thee official Rumpus wine critic.
Thanks for the tribute to Laura Nyro. I hadn't heard of her, but Wedding Bell Blues is one of those songs I always sing along with when I hear it on the radio. - stewdog said...
-
I gladly accept that mantle, KM. I'm well prepared for the job. All my life, people have told me to "put a cork in it".
As to Laura Nyro, the fact you hadn't heard of her bolsters my assertion that she is an "underrated". She rivals Carol King as a songwriter, yet few today know her.
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Cagey
The piece moves slowly. The first year and a half of the piece was silence. A new note is scheduled to be played in the next month or so. Apparently, Cage first wrote the piece to be played in a time span of about twenty minutes on the piano. The piece was then adapted for organ with the tempo slowed down -- WAY down. A new, special, organ is being built to play some notes of the piece scheduled to sound some years from now.
I'm really not making this up.
I am familiar with a few works by John Cage, and have actually performed one of them for an audience on the piano: 4'33". In case you haven't "heard" it or of it, I will tell you that this piece is 4 minutes and 33 seconds of silence. (The piece has also been successfully performed by orchestras, singers, and chamber groups. As you might imagine, very little rehearsal is needed). The piece is actually pretty affecting -- especially if you don't know what's coming.
As for the piece scheduled to last 639 years, part of me just loves it although I haven't yet had the opportunity to hear a single note. The months of anticipation before each new note is sounded, the intergenerational effort required to complete the performance, the generous pauses between notes permitting contemplation of what has come before and what is to come -- who could demand more from any piece of art?
Of course another part of me thinks: what a load of you know what. But hey.
20 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
I'm . . .
- Kate Marie said...
-
vaguely . . .
- Kate Marie said...
-
remembering ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
a quote ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
...
- Kate Marie said...
-
I read ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
somewhere ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
that conceptual art ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
is a kind of art which, ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
once you understand the concept, ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
you ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
needn't ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
actually ...
- Kate Marie said...
-
...
- Kate Marie said...
-
experience.
- Kate Marie said...
-
[I collapse in exhaustion. Wild applause and shouts of "Brava!" resound in the blogosphere for months on end.]
- stewdog said...
-
How thick must the sheet music be for that 600 Plus year piece? You have to account for all the space and silence.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Sounds like Foundation, but less fun.
- Jeff said...
-
I'm with Kate Marie on this one: much conceptual art seriously insults its audience. I don't know what John Cage wants me to learn from his 639-year concert--a better understanding of the passage of time, perhaps, or a reminder of the role that time plays in the creation of music--but whatever it is, I can probably grasp it with less of an investment in time and money on the part of his crew. Or does he think I can't?
On the other hand, anything that keeps the Germans safely preoccupied for several centuries can't be all bad. - Kate Marie said...
-
Amen to that, my friend.
Desiderata
The copy I saw also contained the legend that it was found in a church in the 17th century. That myth is debunked here.
12 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
Call me sappy, but I've always kinda liked that Desiderata poem--not because it's a good poem, which is really kinda isn't, but as a worthy plea for patience and thoughtfulness. (I also never overdosed on it during the 70s, although there were few bathrooms in New Jersey that didn't have that treacly poem: "Footprints"? "Footsteps"? Whatever it's called...)
- stewdog said...
-
OK, You're Sappy!
It has it's benefits and positives, but it was just overdone. I can't help but be cynical about it now. - Jeff said...
-
At this point, I figure my sappiness is common knowledge in this corner of the blogosphere. :)
- stewdog said...
-
Nonsense. Your comments are always welcome and appreciated. Maybe we are all saps, so if you are a sap. . well, it could be a maple syrup fest.
- Kate Marie said...
-
I'm a proud member of the Sap Club. I applaud us for having the courage of our sappiness.
Speaking of The Desiderata, I remember having to *sing* it when I took chorus in high school. Sister Sue (yes, she was really called Sister Sue) always followed a pretty hippie repertoire. - Kate Marie said...
-
And by the way, how could you lump Tolkien in with that?
- stewdog said...
-
KM, is that a rhetorical question? I'm not comparing Mr. Bored Of The Rings with The Sappy Poem. I was just pointing out that both JRRT and Des found rebirth in 60's culture. So did Peyote and bell bottoms, but I don't equate them.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Bell bottoms found rebirth in the 60's? You mean we didn't invent them?
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Don't you think the boomers really ought to take to heart at least this line:
"Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth."
I mean, enough with the Botox and face lifts already. Get a rocking chair and get over it. - stewdog said...
-
CIV, I wouldn't consider Botox to be a thing of youth to surrender. I think they are referring to pot, driving too fast, dating fast women, drinking cheap beer, staying out all night, listening to loud music, liking stupid movies etc.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Stewdog, Botox was just my shorthand for saying what you said. I mean, check out Marion Barry. Still with the crack and the criminals and who knows what. Rolling Stones still can't get no satisfaction? JFKerry's got to have a smooth face that looks like it might crack. Madonna thinking she's still 20.
You don't have to go directly from 50 to a rocking chair, but 50 is NOT 20 and 60 is NOT 30 and growing old isn't the worst thing that can happen to you. - Kate Marie said...
-
Right on, CIV! I think it's much worse to grow old without growing up.
Friday, January 13, 2006
"Re-viewing the Russian Movies"
Pathos was another matter. For pathos there must be victims, and in five of these six movies the glare of triumphant righteousness is so blinding that one can't see any victims at all, only a few martyrs of the working class, their lives well expended, and a few bourgeois or monarchist anachronisms, swept properly into the dustbin of history. No death is without meaning; even that baby hurtling in its carriage down the Odessa steps in Potemkin is part of the great plan, and the spectacle is exciting but not saddening. Of course it could be said that Eisenstein and Pudovkin and Dovzhenko were the real victims, ultimately betrayed by the revolution they celebrated; but that idea, if it is important at all, becomes important only on reflection. It is hard to feel the pathos of their lives when you see them playing with corpses; if they had got the chance, they would have made a handsome montage of my corpse too, and given it a meaning -- their meaning and not mine."
-- Robert Warshow, "Re-viewing the Russian Movies," in The Immediate Experience
The Mouse That Roared
There is justice in this world after all.
I Walked That Line
Oh, to the movie. I thought that I would like this film and I did. So did most critics. The two leads were superb and the music is infectious. My only criticisms are that it ran a little long and that, like Ray, to a lesser degree, it focused too much on the negative of a great celebrity's life.
Two big paws up from Stewdog.
5 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
Do tell: what was the film?
- Kate Marie said...
-
I'm assuming one of Stewdog's links was meant to be to Rotten Tomatoes, but I'm sure the movie was Walk the Line. Were you being sarcastic, Jeff, or are you bleary-eyed and fuzzy-headed from hours of Civ. 4? :)
- Jeff said...
-
No sarcasm intended! Besides, I haven't purchased Civ 4. I'm resisting, because I'm too busy these days, and I'd rather not emerge with a Howard-Hughes beard and crazy-dude fingernails after six sleepless weeks of simulated warfare...
- stewdog said...
-
Walk the line it was.
Just finished watching Cinderalla Man. Why is it that nothing makes great movies like boxing.
Russell Crowe is, as always, fantastic, as was Bart Giamannti's kid.
You can have Rene Zellwagger, wigger, or whatever. Should have been hit by a truck after Jerry McGwire. KM's sister is right. She always looks like she just smelled dog poop. - Kate Marie said...
-
I've never actually played one of those Civilization games. It sounds like something I'd want to keep my husband from ever discovering!
Where Have You Gone Aunt Jemima?
The Leonard Tose Route
Thursday, January 12, 2006
3 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Er. . .KM. . was there supposed to be a link in there? Have you gone the Leonard Tose Route with us?
- Kate Marie said...
-
No, Stewdog, no link. It's a reference to Miracle on 34th Street. To be honest, I was just sitting here wondering what it would be like to blog drunk, and that scene from Miracle on 34th Street occurred to me, and I thought, if I were blogging drunk, that's the sort of thing I would post.
Does that mean I've gone the Leonard Tose route? I blog. You decide.
That reminds me -- one day you or Wonderdog should explain to our ten readers what the Leonard Tose route actually *is.* - Kate Marie said...
-
There, I added a link if it makes you feel any better.
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Shaking My Head
Mr. Blackwell
1. Britney Spears
2. Mary-Kate Olsen
3. Jessica Simpson
4. Eva Longoria
5. Mariah Carey
6. Paris Hilton
7. Anna Nicole Smith
8. Shakira
9. Lindsay Lohan
10. Renée Zellweger
2 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
OK, but let's be fair. Where would Stewdog rank on the Rumpus best/worst dressed list?
- stewdog said...
-
I don't embarass myself. I can't afford to dress as I would choose to do. But I never wear stripes with plaid, don't wear white shoes after labor day and my ties usually match my suit and shirt.
Sour Grapes Turned To Whine
Meanwhile, Hugh Hewitt continues to be a good source for commentary and links on the hearing.
Update: Check out this letter about my first comment here:
Re "The Alito testimony you won't hear," Opinion, Jan. 11 Hell hath no fury like a whiney fringe partisan scorned. While Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) often represents voices on the leftmost fringe of partisan clap-trappery, he was wise to scratch Stephen R. Dujack from the list [of witnesses to testify at the Alito hearings]. The ridiculous nature of Dujack's absurd testimony that wasn't to be would have made the more reasonable partisan opposition to Alito look foolish by association.Thus, by willingly stepping in and attempting to resuscitate Dujack's ego, The Times has compromised its own credibility and judgment.To stop the slide, I offer you the following suggestion: Next time the editors are tempted to offer The Times' distinguished forum to such pedestrian smear attempts, perhaps you should just offer the benevolent writer a bullhorn, and everyone on the editorial board who sympathizes can follow him to the street corner. KIRK TABER Roseville, Calif.
I couldn't have said it better, Kirk!
2 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
From what I've seen of the hearings, it's all just been more evidence that Republican candidates win elections these days not necessarily on their own appeal or the merits of their ideology, but because their political opponents are utterly repellent.
- stewdog said...
-
You are on to something there. Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden and the rest of these fools are just repulsive. I saw where the nominee's wife left the room in tears after hearing the suggestions that her husband is some kind of bigoted beast. Just a hideous disrepectful embarrasing charade with these fools playing to their base. Have another cocktail, Teddy Boy.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Baseball Trivia
A. Bruce Sutter, elected today to the Hall of Fame.
This Cardinal fan says congratulations, and thanks for the memories.
Day 2
Food for thought:
1. If the precedent of Roe v. Wade is so strong, and should never be overturned, why don't we still have slavery today?
2. The left hammers home that Alito is replacing Sandra Day O'Connor, so he should be a clone of her. How come that same rule didn't apply to Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Didn't she replace Byron White? And she certainly isn't a clone of anyone else (actually the thought of cloning her just made me ill).
Iran
A little something to brighten your day
What kind of person—other than a Teaching Assistant, who has no choice—would subject himself to hundreds of pages of what Keith Gessen jokingly called a “critical mass of stuff that nobody would want to publish”? Who could endure all that flashy, empty-headed prose? Only someone very keen to reassure himself that he’s wise, that he’s a step ahead of the game, that he perceives and appreciates what others cannot. The kind of person who’d happily walk the Trail of Tears from Manhattan to Red Hook just to drink Schlitz in an old factory building. A real “intellectual.”
Speaking of intellectuals: a digression, for comic relief. In college, we joked that every issue of the student literary magazine had to include at least one story that opens with a long, baroque description of the author, er, “protagonist,” lighting and smoking a cigarette. I’m pleased to note that the kids are all grown up and they’ve still got it. From Marco Roth’s fifteen-page “Last Cigarettes”:
"Boredom is a moment of danger. Cigarettes can be a way of harnessing this danger, the crisis of confidence that ensues when a writer is stuck or lonely and wonders whether his regimen is really a regimen, an honorable structure independently chosen, or, as he has doubtless heard throughout his American life, an extravagant form of shirking. He must prove everyone wrong and show what a good worker he is. Type, pause, light up, type, type, type, ash, type, inhale, type."
If boredom is a moment of danger, I just fell out a fifth-story window into an abandoned mineshaft full of quicksand.
I shouldn't laugh, though. If I ever attempted to write fiction, I'd love for it, above all, to be funny. But I'm sure any true comedy would end up being of the unintentional "Last Cigarettes" variety. So I'm not laughing at the n+1 gang; I'm laughing with them.
1 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
Thanks for the link to this. I wonder, where does that weird self-conscious style of college lit-mag writing come from? Even if students are immersed in 20th-century fiction, very little of it is obsessed with those particular conceits. Kids must pick up those writerly stereotypes from sitcoms, or maybe from somewhere else in the popular culture, but I'm not entirely sure where.
Monday, January 09, 2006
Slammin' Sammy
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, or Hyanisport compound, Teddy, the Sage Of Chappiquiddick, hands shaking, dreaming of the tinkle of ice in a glass just before the booze is poured, flat out lies about Alito's record.
What a great opportunity for the Democratic Judiciary Committee members to make absolute fools of themselves once again. Still bearing the heel marks of John Roberts in their foreheads, they press ahead. Memo to Republican members of the Committee. . pass your time. This guy doesn't need your help and it is so much fun to see Shumer, Biden, Durbin, and Kennedy just implode on themselves.
For A Fighter
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
-- Dylan Thomas
The Usual Suspects
Do You Believe In Miracles?
Saint George
Sunday, January 08, 2006
Lyric For The Day
I took myself a blue canoe
And I floated like a leaf
Dazzling, dancing
Half enchanted
In my Merlin sleep
Crazy was the feeling
Restless were my eyes
Insane they took the paddles
My arms they paralysed
So where to now St. Peter
If it's true I'm in your hands
I may not be a Christian
But I've done all one man can
I understand I'm on the road
Where all that was is gone
So where to now St. Peter
Show me which road I'm on
Which road I'm on
It took a sweet young foreign gun
This lazy life is short
Something for nothing always ending
With a bad report
Dirty was the daybreak
Sudden was the change
In such a silent place as this
Beyond the rifle range
I took myself a blue canoe
Music by Elton John Lyrics by Bernie Taupin Available on the album Tumbleweed Connection
© 1970 Dick James Music Limited
I'm In The Mood For Borking. . .
The fun starts tomorrow. Bring it on. Looks like the Dems have an airtight strategy to defeat this nomination. He belonged to an organization at Princeton in which a member wrote an article that can be described as racist. Doesn't matter that HE didn't write it. Guilt by assassination.
Saturday, January 07, 2006
Quote of the day
-- C. S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
1 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
More impressive when put in context. He was being chased by a lion and a witch when he wrote that.
Iraq and Terror
Friday, January 06, 2006
Will Katrina become a fable we've all agreed upon?
(Via Instapundit)
Death Of A Salesman
2 Comments:
- said...
-
I played against Rod Dedeaux's Trojans twice a year, each year from 1957 to 1961. Never posted a W, but we were always treated with respect by Dedeaux and his teams, who treated us like we were the Yankees coming to play. Got that "Tiger" appellation laid on me many times and proud of it. Strangely, he turned me into a USC football fan when I had not been one before.
- stewdog said...
-
Great story, Canine of the Summit. The Coach seems to have had that rare gift of making everyone with whom he came in contact feel important. I'm sure that there are hundreds of similar stories of lives favorably touched by this man. Fight on, Tiger.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
Days like today ...
I drove with the girls up over our local hills today, and as we started down the southwest side of the hills, we could see out across Whittier and Orange County to the shining strip of the Pacific on the horizon, and beyond that, twenty six miles across the sea, the clear shape of Catalina rising.
2 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
And it is 37 in Boston
- Kate Marie said...
-
And that's balmy for them this time of year.
Pat Robertson Please Shut Up
Update: Richard Scott Nokes at Unlocked Wordhoard warns -- in "reluctant defense of Pat Robertson" -- that what Pat Robertson actually said may have been misinterpreted. I haven't seen a transcript or heard audio of Robertson's remarks, but I wanted to pass along that caveat from a smart and reliable source. Whether Robertson's words in this instance have been unfairly misconstrued, I think we can all appreciate the wisdom of Horace Jeffery Hodges' observation in the comments: "Pat Robertson is God's way of reminding us that Jerry Falwell is sane."
Update II: Scrappleface has more.
4 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
What a freakin' idiot.
- Horace Jeffery Hodges said...
-
Pat Robertson is God's way of reminding us that Jerry Falwell is sane.
Jeffery Hodges
* * * - Jeff said...
-
The New York Times reported today that two left-leaning Washington organizations, People for the American Way and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, each have a staffer who monitors Pat Robertson's show every day. They alert the media when he says something outrageous.
Maybe I'm just out of it, but is Pat Robertson still such a big influence among the "religious right" that it's worthwhile for his opposition to monitor him? For years now, I've assumed he was pretty much a has-been. - Kate Marie said...
-
Interesting story, Jeff. I wonder the same thing you do about Pat Robertson. My impression has been that he's not that influential except for a fairly small faction of the religious right. But doesn't his organization still make a lot of money?
Anyway, I'll remember that story the next time a "liberal" howls about Michael Moore being portrayed as the face of the Democratic party.
"You underworld types hurt my feelings. I'm your buddy. Aren't you supposed to be picking on the tough-on-crime conservative down the block?
Do people really think this way?
"There is a sort of an unwritten code in Washington, among the underworld and the hustlers and these other guys, that I am their friend," Barry said at an afternoon news conference in which he described the robbery in detail. "I don't advocate what they do. I advocate conditions to change what they do. I was a little hurt that this betrayal did happen."
5 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Outrageous, as anything concerning this guy is certain to be.
Before Spy magazine went out of business, they published the transcript of the sting that sent him to prision. It was classic. - Conservative in Virginia said...
-
"... among the underworld and the hustlers and these other guys, that I am their friend"
Jeff, you can confirm this, right? Didn't I see you helping Marion with his groceries last week? - Jeff said...
-
The bigger scandal involving Barry occurred back in October and was largely overlooked by the press: the former Mayor-for-Life hadn't paid taxes for eight years. The feds negotiated a plea with him that allowed him to keep his job on the city council.
In the paper today: A Barry aide moves the Martin Luther King, Jr., Day parade from January 16 to April--and then Barry himself balks when he sees that the date is April 1... - Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Jeff, Jeff, Jeff. What taxes? He's hardly made any money the last 8 years since he stopped taking bribes. Oops. I mean, since he, um, found God? No, wait. He was broken up over the breakup of marriage #4 and then there was that cancer thing, well, who can remember to pay taxes with all that happening. You know what drugs do to your memory.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
And that April Fool's thing? Old news. Once the WashPost made fun of their choice (it's just too darn cold for Barry to attend a MLK parade in January), the ward 8 group changed it to April 8. Oops. Conflicts with the Cherry Blossom parade. Now what? Why didn't Marty think ahead and get himself born in June, when there are no federal holidays?
Hollywood's Message to Fly Over America
"What Is History. . . .
3 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
That's a good one, Stewdog.
Can I confess something? Until a few days ago, *I* thought Sacco and Vanzetti were innocent. - stewdog said...
-
Of course you did. That is because it was the myth that was spread, which became the fable agreed upon, which became history.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Sacco and Vanzetti -- don't they make gelato? The mocha is excellent.
Cheery reading for the New Year, or I read depressing books so you don't have to ...
The Sea really bugged me. I've never read another John Banville novel, so I don't know whether this one is typical of his writing in general, but nothing irritates me more these days than a writer who has considerable gifts at his command who writes novels that function as elegant window displays for the considerable gifts at his command. The plot of the book, such as it is, finds middle-aged Max Morden retiring to a rented house by the sea, near the "chalets" where he spent his boyhood summers, to mourn his wife's death and think about the past. The first person account intercuts Max's memories of his wife's final months with his memories of a "significant" summer he spent by the sea, during which he became fascinated with the Graces, a family a rung or two higher on the social ladder than Max himself. I put "significant" in quotation marks, because I can't for the life of me figure out what's significant about Max's relationship with the Graces, other than the opportunity it affords Banville to display his considerable gifts, and -- what's worse -- I can't even fathom what's significant about his wife's death other than the opportunity it affords Banville . . . well, you get the idea. The premise of the novel seems to be "Hey, look at me, everybody, I'm the 'heir to Nabokov.' The back of the book says so. And besides, my book is filled with Beautiful Prose." The linking of Banville's name with Nabokov on the back of the book does Banville a considerable disservice. I kept expecting withering satire and a devastating prose style (Banville is good, but he's not that good), and all I got was the narrator's tendency to pepper his recollections with big, bloated words.
"Character-driven" novels are not of themselves a bad thing. Perhaps my favorite novel of the last thirty years relies more on character than on plot. If you're going to rely on character, however, you'd better make sure your characters are at least one, and preferably all, of the following: a) sympathetic; b) compelling; c) more than merely a place marker for inflated, if not particularly profound, ruminations on the Big Questions.
One of Banville's passages may illustrate what bothers me most about this book. In the passage, Morden describes the photographs his terminally ill amateur-photographer wife has taken of fellow hospital patients -- all of whom have, apparently cheerfully, consented to expose their scars, wounds, and afflictions for the sake of . . . photographic immortality? . . . the gratification of their exhibitionist desires? . . . the betterment of mankind? I got stuck, as I read this passage, trying to figure out why the people in the photographs had agreed to present their private suffering in so public a fashion. Then I realized they were props, placed on stage to be rearranged and remarked upon, to give the leading man something to do while he wows us with his method acting. Oh, come on, one might object, isn't Yorrick's skull a prop? Of course, but it's not merely a prop. We admire Hamlet's ability to make him live again, but that's just it. He makes him live again. Nobody really lives in Banville's novel, including his narrator, and perhaps that's not surprising in a novel that is mostly about death. What's more surprising, though, is that, for all his lovely style, Banville leaves us with very little impression that anyone in this book ever really has lived.
In the book's final passages, Max Morden likens the moment of his wife's death to a moment in his childhood when he had been lifted up by a suddenly surging sea, carried toward shore a bit, and then set down again. It was, he says, "as if nothing had happened. And indeed nothing had happened, a momentous nothing, just another of the great world's shrugs of indifference." That's what it feels like to read The Sea.
The Year of Magical Thinking ends with an image of the swelling sea as well:
I think about swimming with [John] into the cave at Portugese Bend, about the swell of the clear water, the way it changed, the swiftness and power it gained as it narrowed through the rocks at the base of the point. The tide had to be just right. We had to be in the water at the very moment the tide was right. We could only have done this a half a dozen times at most during the two years we lived there but it is what I remember. Each time we did it I was afraid of missing the swell, hanging back, timing it wrong. John never was. You had to feel the swell change. You had to go with the change. He told me that. No eye is on the sparrow but he did tell me that.
That's nice, I think. It's at least an image of Didion's life with her husband (writer John Gregory Dunne), and while it is certainly suggestive of larger themes and interpretations, it doesn't defer to them.
To be honest, I was prepared to dislike this book. I hate to admit that, since it's an account of the year Didion spent grieving for her husband and tending to her gravely ill daughter. It's a sad subject, made even sadder by the knowledge that Didion's only child died shortly after the book was finished. I suppose there are two reasons I wanted to dislike it. While I doubted that the book itself would be exploitive or sensationalistic, I thought Didion must surely be aware that there would be a ready-made market for a book like hers -- even people outside literary circles would be curious to find out how the well-known writer dealt with the sudden death of her well-known writer husband. I thought Didion, who famously remarked upon the writer's tendency to always be "selling someone out," should have refused to offer it for public consumption. Wasn't there something unseemly, I thought, about her willingness to dissect her grief? Wasn't there something self-absorbed about it? But that's insufferably, and even hypocritically, high-minded of me. Writers are inevitably self-absorbed -- even writers of shabby little blogs. Didion is a writer, a very good one. Why not write about one of her life's most important events?
Now let me try to explain the other reason I was reluctant to like this book. I had for some years been a great admirer of Didion's style, and I still am, I suppose. She is a master of detachment, a virtuoso of the flat affect. She has an unerring eye for the details of place and time, a fine ear for dialogue which juxtaposes the bizarre and the prosaic to achieve a kind of conversational surrealism. Recently, however, without actually rereading any of Didion's books, I have wondered whether her style wasn't a triumph of attitude over meaning. I was prepared to dislike The Year of Magical Thinking because of a kind of anticipatory disillusionment, an expectation that my suspicions about Didion's prose would be confirmed.
And I still haven't said anything about the book itself. It's a good book, a clear-eyed, almost clinical depiction of grief and its disorientations and disjunctions. If it resists the assignment of meaning, it doesn't embrace meaninglessness. Instead, it recognizes how heartbreakingly human it is to seek meaning, to view our lives with a writer's eye, and to treat the events of our lives as "authored," whether we actually believe them to be or not.
1 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
I read a number of Joan Didion's books when in college and I respect her tremendously as a writer, although I am not in lock step with her politics. Funny that.
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Ouch
Like a child, I've cheered them when they've won in recent years. Like a child, I know nothing but sadness with this loss.
I haven't felt a sports sting like this in a long time. Oy the pain. However, I intend to pretend it didn't happen. I'll read no sports pages, listen to no sports talk radio, watch no ESPN for at least a week. This did not happen. I intend to make it so.
4 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
Okay, I feel your pain, bro. I almost posted a taunting response to your cri de coeur, which consisted of the game's score in huge type, but I thought better of it. You'll note, however, that I was sorely tempted, given how you wallowed in the Notre Dame defeat.
Actually, I was totally for SC. But Topdog, our younger bro, and I predicted that if Texas got the ball back, their quarterback was going to win the game for them. That's why I agreed that they should have gone for it on 4th and 1, but Carroll called a lousy play. - Wonderdog said...
-
Thanks for going easy, KM. I probably deserved it after my Notre Dame taunts.
I disagree that Carroll's 4th and 1 was a lousy play call. They hadn't stopped LenDale all night and I felt sure he could get a yard in that situation. The bottom line is, they made the plays they had to and SC choked it a little bit. - stewdog said...
-
Great Game
Bad call going for it at 4th at (wasn't it closer to 2?) in THAT field position with THAT quarterback.
Reggeie Bush' faux pas earlier in the game turned it around.
Too bad they allowed a TD that wasn't.
USC, you done been hooked.
Great Game. - said...
-
Waaa!..WAAAAA!!!! Stop your crying you Trojan suck up...They lost. And they lost to a better team, no matter WHAT that idiot Matt Lienert says. Vince Young showed why HE should have won the Heismen last night ladies and gentlemen. ( Hey Nice game Reggie..) The decision to go on 4th and 2 was the absolute right one..and they had the absolute right player executing it. LenDale White was the only player who showed up for SC on offense last night...he just didn't make it. Don't blame Pete Carrol, Pat the Texas Defense on the back and accept it. They were beaten fair and square, and TEXAS is # 1 End of story.
2 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
Interesting. I like him when I have heard him on Hugh Hewitt. Ask him if he can do cliff notes on his articles.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Gads. We should've had more kids.
KM, back to work. Scotty & WD, nice work. How about another? SD, get those puppies of yours married and having kids already. Time's a wasting.
Concert Fallout
OK. . please. . get a grip. .and get a life.
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
A Good Read
4 Comments:
- Jeff said...
-
That's interesting: I've seen Mother Angelica on EWTN for years, but I'd had no idea that the network was primarily her creation.
- Kate Marie said...
-
Thanks for the recommendation, Stewdog. You're all going to laugh at me, but I don't think I've ever heard of Mother Angelica. I'm going to buy the book, though.
- stewdog said...
-
I believe that I first heard of the book on Laura Ingram, or Hugh Hewitt. While I was visiting my parents in the desert last week it was out. I picked it up and took off with it. I had never seen her or heard of her, but I am one "lapsed Catholic" who is enthralled by her story. I think my favorite tid bit is how she got the old "Dons" from her Italian neighborhood in Canton, Ohio to donate labor to the sisters. Classic.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
I read her "Answers" book years ago. My favorite story -- and the only part I remember -- was about acquiring land she needed for her network. After several unsuccessful attempts to buy a certain parcel of land, she prayed hard for an answer and got one. Next time she meets with the owner, she asks him to give her the land. He does.
I've never seen Mother Angelica or EWTN -- no cable -- but from her writing she sounds like quite a character.
1 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
I'm with Larry. No way I'd see that movie. Even if I did go to movies. Which I don't.
"Cast Me Not Off in Old Age"
2 Comments:
- stewdog said...
-
I think Peter Pan had the best solution regarding aging.
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Excellent piece, KM. Gives me much to think about. It really isn't as black and white as many would like to believe. Ugh. It's only going to get worse as the self-important boomers reach old age. Soylent Green in 2016?
Of gay cowboys and real men ...
Random Thoughts
I suppose it's silly to expect a bit more nuance in a children's book, but by the time children reach high school, I think they're ready for some counter-narratives as an anitdote to the litany of poisonous platitudes they've imbibed since kindergarten. I've delved into the follow your heart phenomenon elsewhere, but I think the ever-popular you can't judge a book by its cover deserves some scrutiny and scorn as well. When I taught at a Catholic all-girls middle school and high school, the administration always had to issue warnings about Halloween costumes that wouldn't be permitted on the day the girls dressed up for Halloween (they had to be warned not to come as pregant nuns, for instance). One of the styles of costume that was verboten was "gangsta" fashion. Several girls complained to me during a homeroom that the anti-"gangsta" directive was needlessly restrictive, that they didn't mean to endorse a particular lifestyle by dressing in such a fashion, that they merely liked the way it looked, and, besides, you can't judge someone by their style of dress. I walked over to the chalkboard and drew a big swastika on the board. "What if," I asked, "I walked into class tomorrow morning wearing this symbol on my shirt because I thought it looked pretty?" That pretty much shut them up, as a well-placed reductio ad absurdum is wont to do with high school kids. They didn't even bother to ask me whether I was suggesting some equivalence between "gangsta" style and Nazi "style," which I wasn't. My point was to get them to stop believing, or pretending to believe, that the manner in which they presented themselves in public mattered only to themselves.
Ooops, it seems I've started the New Year out on a sour, rambling, incoherent note. Forget everything I just said.
Here's my amended New Year's message to one and all: follow your heart.
3 Comments:
- Conservative in Virginia said...
-
Geez, KM, you caved awfully quickly. And just when I was about to welcome you into the Grumpy Old Coot club.
Just wait till your little princess wants to do something awful and says, "But Mom! I have to follow my heart!"
CIV
member, GOC of VA - stewdog said...
-
OK, you started with Children's books so I'll just pick up on that thread. One of my favorite series of Children's books was Good Dog Carl, about a precocious Rottweiller. There were others in the series. The drawings, and sense of humor and wonder made these special. Have either of the princesses been exposed to them?
- Kate Marie said...
-
Fear not, CIV. My "follow your heart" was ironic, in the best tradition of the grumpy old coot club. Didn't they tell you that when they taught you the secret handshake?
Stewdog, the girls used to love the Good Dog, Carl books!
Monday, January 02, 2006
The Last Day
March of the Penguins: I am probably the last mammal on the planet to witness this exquisite jewel. Perhaps the best nature documentary ever filmed. Beauty in the cinematography and the story. I used to think that "Penguins" was a lame name for a hockey team, but after seeing the perseverence, patience, and grit of these Emperors of Antarctica, the name yields only honor and stature.
The 40 Year Old Virgin: Sorry critics, but I am not in line with the heaping of praise on this uneven turkey. I love Steve Carrell, and there were some good elements here, but the movie doesn't hold up as a whole, and the first half is embarassing at times.
Bewitched: The Critics savaged this film, but I am one of the few who actually enjoyed it. Part of my pleasure is how much I loved the old show, but mainly, I loved it because Nicole Kidman is just sooooo damned cute in it. She really shows that she is a throwback to the old time actresses of Hollywood. Will Ferrell is weak and miscast, Shirly MacLane is HORRIBLE, the script is uneven , but there is one great part in addition to Nicole's, that of Steve Carell playing Paul Lynde playing Uncle Arthur. I don't expect anyone else to like this movie, but I did!
Back to checking the Casa for water. Man, I feel sorry for the Rose Parade People.
1 Comments:
- Kate Marie said...
-
Good luck taking the plunge back into ordinary existence, Stewdog. Looking forward to seeing you this week. And thanks for Stew's Reviews. Maybe I'll try Bewitched, since I'm a fan of the old show (though the post-Dick York ones aren't quite as good), and I like Nicole Kidman, too.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home