Today is


   "A word to the wise ain't necessary --  
          it's the stupid ones that need the advice."
					-Bill Cosby

Tuesday, January 31, 2006


SHAME ON YOU

No, not to St. Cindy, for showing up at the SOTU address and getting thrown out before it started, but to California Representative Lynn Woosley for giving Our Lady Of Perpetual Protest a ticket to the event in the first place.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Two Abortion Rulings

Separate panels of US Courts of Appeal in New York and California struck down the federal law banning partial birth abortions because it didn't provide an exception for the mother's health. I personally had to agree with the sharp dissent of Judge Chester Straub in New York:

"Allowing a physician to destroy a child as long as one toe remains within the mother would place society on the path towards condoning infanticide. . . "I find the current expansion of the right to terminate a pregnancy to cover a child in the process of being born morally, ethically and legally unacceptable."

One of the prevailing judges on that court felt duty bound to strike the law down even though he found the "procedure" to be "gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized."

You can find National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales here.

HT: Drudge.

4 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

I wonder how the "mother's" health is preserved by killing a baby just prior to birth and then delivering it. I thought the usual and accepted method was a cesarean section. And why do they call these women "mothers" when they are doing all they can to not become mothers?

January 31, 2006 4:25 PM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

CIV, we all know the "health" of the mother includes her mental well-being as well. If having a child would result in the slightest bit of emotional distress (i.e. "how will I ever be able to afford all those diapers?") then it is her Constitutional right to crush his or her skull.

As one who has studied Constitutional Law and has read case upon case strike down statues for their ambiguity, how on earth does the ambiguous provision "to protect the health of the mother" pass Constitutional muster?

As I've said before, reasonable people can disagree about the right to an abortion during the initial stages of pregnancy, but only the radical extremists in our society find it acceptable under these circumstances.

January 31, 2006 6:43 PM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

Yes, I meant statutes not statues.

January 31, 2006 6:46 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Good thing you clarified, or we'd run out of monuments here in Wash, DC.

Funny that someone might feel distress in having a baby born alive, but not dead. Weird, actually. Hard to believe anyone defends partial birth abortion even in the 9th month.

A local radio station here has been running ads for Second Look. First time I've EVER heard a pro-life radio ad. They're pretty tame, but that's probably how they got on the air.

January 31, 2006 8:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 30, 2006


Done Deal

Filibuster Fails. Judge Alito will win the senate vote tomorrow and be sworn in just before the State of the Onion address.
Kerry, Kennedy, and the Krazy Klan have played to their base, but in doing so have pushed themselves further out on the fringe.
72-25. Hugh checks in on it.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


There Is A Timeout On The Field. . .

. . . with the score 34.0 to 5.5. That would be the difference in the respective war chest of the RNC v. the DNC and Drudge reports that the Dems are mad as hell at Howard Dean. YYYYYYYEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Rumpus Riddle Answer #12

Okay, I know. I know. I've failed you all miserably in my job as the Rumpus Riddler but I have for you a new riddle! And the good news is you get immediate gratification in knowing that you got the right answer. Try it out and see. But the bad news is (CIV, I'm talking to you here) there's no point in double guessing as I've heard some people (CIV) have a good time doing. :) Let me know what you think about the new answer format by emailing the blog at rumpusblog@aol.com.

Two bodies have I,
Though both joined in one.
The stiller I stand,
The faster I run.

An hourglass.

3 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

An Hourglass!

January 30, 2006 1:35 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Wait just a minute. Does this mean you are no longer tracking answers and posting winners? Bah, humbug.

On the other hand, not having to wait until a baby is born and weaned before getting the correct answer does have its advantages.

February 02, 2006 5:27 AM  
Blogger Scotty said...

Not weaned...just until he started solids. Well...a little while after he started solids. Okay, okay, a few MONTHS after he started solids.

And don't worry, I'll still post the answer when the riddle changes. I'll even try to change it BEFORE the littlest Wonderpup has his 1st birthday!

February 03, 2006 11:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Creepiness continues

It's just past midnight and I'm messing around on the computer out here all by myself and two minutes ago I hear this creepiness emerge from the children's playroom: "The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round, the wheels on the bus go round and round, all throoough the townnnn."

Yes, there is a toy in there that plays that wretched song in electronic children's voices. Yes, we have a cat. Yes, he could have tripped it. But the goosebumps on my neck are still hanging around and having a confab.

There's a brood of possessed schoolchildren in there. I just know it. I'm bracing myself for a haunting rendition of "London Bridge".

Oh the horror. The horror.

3 Comments:

Blogger Scotty said...

Hey Wonderdog, you should hear the fire engine's sirens go off in there when the kids are asleep and the cats purring on your lap!

January 30, 2006 7:59 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

"Calling Father Karras. . Father Damian Karras, please pick up line 1."

January 30, 2006 8:53 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Hey, I once woke up in the middle of the night hearing something almost beyond the range of hearing. Very unreal. But I got up to investigate, good parent that I am, and discovered...

the baby's head butted up against the big push button on the crib's mirror toy. An electronic "Twinkle twinkle little star" played over and over and over only waking me.

After that, I always flipped the mirror to the outside of the crib at night, thus defeating its purpose of entertaining baby while parents try to sleep in.

January 30, 2006 5:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, January 29, 2006


"Crazy world. They outta sell tickets. Shoot, I'd buy one."

I don't mean any disrespect toward this poor woman but, I'm sorry, this face transplant story made me laugh -- especially this tidbit:

Five months earlier, Miss Dinoire's features were destroyed when her Labrador savaged her while she was unconscious after a drug overdose. Her face was left a patchwork of torn flesh and exposed bone so shocking that one of her two teenage daughters refused to look at her.

Her own Labrador? That's one creepy-ass dog, dude. Suddenly, I'm having visions of that Rottweiler in The Omen.

I grew up with dogs (mostly German Shepherds) and have slept beside them many a time and I'll tell you this with complete honesty; never for a nanosecond would I have ever dreamed that one of them would rip my face off whilst I lay unconscious beside them.

In the parlance of our times, what is up with that?

One more thing. Setting aside the obvious shot I could take at the "drug overdose", did I read correctly that her daughter refused to look at her? Nice. I mean, maybe it would be one thing if she simply "couldn't bear" to look at her but to just flat out "refuse"?

Maybe that daughter is the demon spawn that that hound from hell was protecting.

2 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

C'mon WD. Give the dog a break. Do we know what she was doing during her last conscious drugged out minutes before passing out? Hell, maybe the dog attached her while she was awake, but she doesn't remember or doesn't want to say what was going on. And maybe the daughter has other reasons for "refusing" to look at her druggie mom. Let's not rush to judgment here.

January 30, 2006 6:54 AM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

You're right, CIV. Perhaps this is a rush to judgment. If the maul was legit, we must acquit!

January 30, 2006 10:28 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Lyric of the Day

Too long to post, but I will link it here. Don McClean ran to the top of the pop chart with American Pie, but I think his song Starry, Starry Night, about Vincent Van Gogh, is one of the most beautiful songs to grace the pop charts ever. I have no reason to explain how it ran into my head today, but it did, and so here it is.

2 Comments:

Blogger Wonderdog said...

Oh, c'mon Stewdog. We all know you love this song simply because it ironically allows you to covertly feed your Vince Vaughn fascination and sing it aloud at the same time.

January 29, 2006 11:08 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Wrong Vincent. It's Price I'm all about.

January 30, 2006 9:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Dear ABC (and CBS and NBC too)

I am very sorry that your anchor/newman was seriously injured in Iraq. My heart goes out to his family and friends and I wish him a speedy recovery. But, please, the coverage is embarassing. I decided to torture myself by flipping between the 3 major networks for their "news" at 530 tonight. The first 15 minutes on each was devoted to this story, and related stories of bombings and all things bad about Iraq. Enough. I know he is one of yours, but you are supposed to be there to report the NEWS. You people aren't as important as you think you are. Please try to show a little perspective.

2 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

Okay, so it wasn't just me; I had the same reaction an hour ago when the injured-journalists story was the top story on our 11 p.m. local newscast. Like you, I certainly mean no disrespect to the injured journalists when I say that something about the coverage was a bit unseemly.

January 29, 2006 9:24 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

OK, the good news is that I'm not a solitary unfeeling clod. The bad news is Jeff is thinking the same way as I, and I recommend that he seek help immediately.

January 30, 2006 9:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, January 28, 2006


Something worthwhile from The Los Angeles Times

"'Can I do this?' his mother agonized, knowing one of her newborns would not live. But for 43 hours, he was hers to cherish."

1 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

What a story. Get out your handkerchiefs.

Who let that get into a liberal rag? Will someone get fired?

January 28, 2006 5:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


The littlest Bag End

I usually bow to no one* in my love of Tolkien, but this is a whole new level of Tolkienphilia.

(Via Unlocked Wordhoard)

*Yes, that's a reference to one of my least favorite scenes in The Return of the King -- least favorite for all sorts of reasons, but partly because it seemed like it was ripped off from Mulan, and partly because it didn't recognize a distinction between what Frodo and Sam did and what Merry and Pippin did.

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

KM, with apologies to Brewer and Shipley, I'm afraid that you are "One Tolkein Over The Line".

January 28, 2006 11:55 AM  
Blogger Scotty said...

Kate, I just checked this out. My gosh! Amazing. And as crazy as it sounds, I would LOVE to do something like that. It would be so cool...

January 30, 2006 11:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 27, 2006


The Brothers Krauthammer

Charles Krauthammer eulogizes a beloved brother.

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Thank you for that, KM.

January 27, 2006 12:21 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Ditto.

January 27, 2006 7:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 26, 2006


Mindset List

Every year, Beloit College publishes a mindset list. This helps remind the aging perfessers that the incoming freshmen aren't their peers. Here is this year's list . I particularly appreciate this since the runt of the litter was born in 87 and is now a college Frosh.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


What Rumpus and Molly Ivins Have In Common

The fact that we won't be voting for Hillary for President. Or so says Jonah Goldberg in this morning's Times.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Lyric Of The Day

I really love this old CS&N song written by Steven Stills. The harmonies really make it, but I appreciate the effective use of alliteration.

HELPLESSLY HOPING

Helplessly hoping
Her harlequin hovers nearby
Awaiting a word
Gasping at glimpses
Of gentle true spirit
He runs, wishing he could fly
Only to trip at the sound of good-bye

Wordlessly watching
He waits by the window
And wonders
At the empty place inside
Heartlessly helping himself to her bad dreams
He worries
Did he hear a good-bye?
Or even hello?

They are one person
They are two alone
They are three together
They are for each other

Stand by the stairway
You'll see something
Certain to tell you confusion has its cost
Love isn't lying
It's loose in a lady who lingers
Saying she is lost
And choking on hello

They are one person
They are two alone
They are three together
They are for each other

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


I can't get to sleep ...

... and I've been thinking -- what the hell do these lyrics mean?

"Give to me your leather ...
Take from me ... my lace."

Sometimes I think I might have done some good in this world if I hadn't listened to pop songs in the 80's. By the time that memorable decade began, my mind was already cluttered with the pop culture ephemera of my formative years. Mom always said, "Don't play ball in the house." Dick York or Dick Sargent? Babaloooo! Babalooo-aiiii-ayyyy! Richie the "C." Hello, Angels! De Plane! De Plane! Good night, Johnboy. Little Buddy. That Afterschool special about the bed-wetter with Lance Kerwin. [Click on that last link at your own risk. It's technically work safe, but your coworkers will look at you real funny.]

But why didn't I just stop there, and leave a little room in my brain for something worthwhile? I have never read Don Quixote, but when we went out for Chinese last night, and that inane Stevie Nicks song started playing, I found I could sing along with the whole accursed thing. And when the girls, my sister, and I browsed at Pottery Barn last week, I absentmindedly sang along with all the songs in the Pottery Barn '80's mix. My four-year-old danced her way through Come On, Eileen, Overkill, and Ain't Nothing Gonna Break My Stride. When I laughed at her and called her a little nut, she said, "I can't stop dancing." [I was *not* letting her disturb other customers. Don't want you to think I'm one of those parents.]

I know how she feels. As it turns out, I can't stop dancing either. I never learned the names of trees and plants and flowers. I never road in the ice truck with Mr. Nealy, or found a litter of kittens up in the hayloft at Unlce Henry's farm. I've never been to a soda shop. The first time I ever saw a firefly, I was a grown woman, and of the few times I've been on a fishing trip, about half were at man-made lakes. If pressed, though, I could probably remember the names of all the actresses who played Charlie's Angels. The sad thing is that it's precisely the flotsam and jetsam of the popular culture that forms my strongest link with my generational past. Or maybe I just think it's sad when it's simply inevitable. If I want to create a bond, or establish my cultural bona fides, with a member of my generation, I usually do it by trading catch phrases and song lyrics and movie quotes. Even people whom I find in other respects insufferable will throw a casual reference to the Sleestaks into the conversation and cause me, if only momentarily, to reconsider first impressions. Sure, Marshall, Will, and Holly are kitschy and fun, but shouldn't the shibboleths of our common culture be more significant, more sublime? Probably not; after all, shibboleths are about pronunciation, not meaning.

But still.

When I was in graduate school, I went with Sadeeq, Madman of Chu, and another friend to see The Real Live Brady Bunch. The show was a verbatim reenactment of an episode of The Brady Bunch (it was the "Oh, my nose!" episode, I think). The actors and actresses camped it up only slightly, and, while the audience certainly appreciated the cheese value of the whole thing, its affection for the show outdistanced its typically cynical and reflexively postmodern pose. In the end, we sang along with the music and shouted out the lines, not with a sneer on our faces, but with love in our hearts -- love that encompassed an affection for our individual pasts, an acknowledgment of vanished innocence, and a kind of gratitude that we had something, anything, to bring us all together. It's the closest we were ever going to get, as a generation, to the Book of Common Prayer.

And that's what's kind of sad about it.

11 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Poor KM. At least your head isn't full of leisure suits and disco songs -- or do-rags and hip hop or rap.

Still, my "baby" never went fishing, probably doesn't remember planting a garden (though I blame the deer for that), never went camping out (because I was never fond of it), and only experienced a farm via a day camp. All the memories of this generation will be on-line. They'll be trading Google and iPod stories when they're in the home. Or maybe they'll just upload their brains and live IN the internet.

Actually, these cultural differences are why I don't understand how marriages of people more than a couple years apart work. I don't grok most of your references and you probably wouldn't know most of mine.

[Hey, Stewdog, do you remember: It's about time. It's about space. About 2 men in the strangest place.]

January 26, 2006 5:50 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Don't mind me, CIV. I was just tired and rambling last night. I thought about deleting the whole mess, but what's a blog for if not self-indulgence?

I guess I partly wish that there was a little more grandeur (spiritual or aesthetic) to the culture that links me with others of my generation.

By the way, a bridge between generations isn't hopeless. I grokked your "grok" reference, I think.

January 26, 2006 8:21 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Hey, KM, I loved this post. I actually understood it.
"Give to me your leather, take from me my lace" is actually a song of barter. The girl likes the guy's wallet and he appreciates the doileys on her divan and easy chair, hence the swap. The IRS, by the way, would consider this a taxable event.
And to CIV, I sure do remember that short lived show about the lost astronauts, It's About Time.

January 26, 2006 9:15 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

KM, I understand this concern well. Last night, I taught my first medieval lit class of the semester, but even though I've lived with the material for years--and this is the fifth time I've taught this course in seven years--I found myself working to remember stuff that should be basic to me, such as where certain kings and scholars fell on an approximate timeline.

In the end, the lecture came together well, but I'm deeply bothered by the realization that it takes time and effort to open the little mental compartment where I store the important cultural and historical knowledge I've accumulated as an adult, even though I can instantaneously recall the lyrics to some crappy song that was on the charts for two weeks in 1986. I can't really claim the "high culture" as my own, but I also can't deny the "pop culture" upbringing that still helps me relate so well to my students. It's a strange thing to be stuck in the middle.

January 26, 2006 9:44 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

And to further illustrate the point, the last sentence triggered this song in my mind "Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you". We just grew up with music as a soundtrack of life.

January 26, 2006 9:48 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Ha! I'm actually wondering if KM's post title, "I can't get to sleep," was supposed to make one of us add: "...I think about the implications..."

January 26, 2006 10:06 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

". . cuz I was tossin' and turnin'. . tossin' and turnin' all night"

January 26, 2006 10:25 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Bingo, Jeff! I was wondering whether anyone would come up with the "implications" of my post title.

It *is* strange to be stuck in the middle, and I don't want to deny the pop culture that I grew up with -- I have an affection for it. I just wish that there were still aspects of "high culture" that were part of the common culture, but maybe it never really was that way.

Anyway, you're way ahead of me in the high culture hierarchy, Jeff. I could benefit from one of your lectures.

Stewdog, this may be a generational thing, too, but when I hear that song (Stuck in the Middle), a very unpleasant image comes to mind. Anyone? Anyone?

January 26, 2006 1:30 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

"Anyone. . anyone. . Bueller. . Bueller. . .Bueller. Got me. It is an old song by Stealer's Wheel. I think it may have been featured in some Yucky movie that I haven't seen, such as Resevoir Dogs, but I can imagine that KM saw that.

January 26, 2006 1:52 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

KM, you can at least try to correct things for your little Princesses.

We do not watch TV. The "culture" at our home, at least, is high tech and classical music. I sneak in some "oldies" -- older than yours -- and the youngster complains of only knowing music "30 years or 300 years old," but guess what I find in the iPod? Classical music and Beatles. And we're talking about HS age (and not a social misfit).

I suppose you could ask Sadeeq and the Dogs to take the Princesses fishing, but that seems like a pointless skill when we know that global warming is going to kill all the fish.

January 26, 2006 2:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm glad there are others that consider 80's pop culture and music high society. Music forms the tapestry of our lives, it may be cliche, bit I can recall the way I felt at a certain time by obsessing over lyrics I identified with, or a song that happened to be playing. I seem to have lost touch with that part of myself that was searching for something to identify with, and it's fun to recapture it at times.

August 12, 2006 11:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 25, 2006


Grandmother's Engagement Ring

Stewdog's Aunt is a wonderful writer. She contributes to a Maui publication in her Silver Streak Columns. Her latest posting is a delightful story of my grandmother's engagement ring. Enjoy!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


The Early Polls Are Encouraging

Drudge Reports on the CNN/Gallup Poll regarding Clinton Lite's bid for the White House and it isn't looking good for the Madam. Committed anti Hillary voters outnumber committed pro Hillary supporters roughly 3 to 1.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Out and About in the Blogosphere

* The Anchoress has a lovely post on confession.

* How should we address professors? Show a little respect, says the good Dr. Nokes. I agree.

* Meanwhile, Professor Drout is dissing binaries: "The New Criticism's tedious 'ambiguity this, ambiguity that' is just as boring as the 'polyvalent this, polyvalent that' or the 'ooh, look. A binary! Let's deconstruct it! for the one millionth time!' approaches of the post-structuralists." How dare he?!!

* Via Dr. Nokes's blog roll, I've recently discovered the joy of The Joy of Curmudgeonry. Check it out and indulge the curmudgeon in you.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


More useless idiots

This Joel Stein column from the Los Angeles Times was all over the blogsophere yesterday.

Here's a sample of Hugh Hewitt's on-air interview with Stein:

HH: All right. Now who is your...this is a column about the troops that begins, "I don't support our troops." We'll get to the specifics in a second. But who is your closest family member or friend who is on active duty?

JS: That's an excellent question. I wouldn't say I have a very close friend. I would say only acquaintances. No family at all.

HH: Who are your acquaintances?

JS: There was a guy who works at Time, that's where I worked last, who quit to serve in the military.

HH: What's his name?

JS: (pause) You know, I'm blanking on his name. But your point is well taken that I don't have many people that I even know who are in the military.

HH: Do you have any, though, other than this guy at Time whose name you can't remember?

JS: Who are serving currently?

HH: Yeah.

JS: Or ever served?

HH: No, serving currently.

JS: Or only in Iraq?

HH: Active duty. Anywhere in the world.

JS: (pause) I'd say I've been pretty isolated from that. I mean, that's a point I made in the column.

The entire transcript and audio is up at Radio Blogger.

2 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Wow. That was some interview. What a dope.

January 25, 2006 12:27 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I glance over his stupid article and then saw if featured in Drudge and looked at it again. It is just a vapid little piece of attention demanding drivel.
But one thing I have noticed. . on the News Hour on PBS when they have their honor roll of the dead from "over there", they all seem to be kids from small towns in the red states who are fighting. Not a lot of Berkeley, Santa Monica, Santa Cruz casualties there.

January 25, 2006 12:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Quote of the Day

"I don't think literature would be possible in a determined world. We might go through the motions but the heart would be out of it. Nobody could then 'smile darkly and ignore the howls.' Even if there were no Church to teach me this, writing two novels would do it. I think the more you write, the less inclined you will be to rely on theories like determinism. Mystery isn't something that is gradually evaporating. It grows along with knowledge."

-- Letters of Flannery O'Connor: The Habit of Being

4 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Huh? Who determines what is determined and what is undetermined. Who makes that determination? Is it a matter of consensual validation, or is is a product of structural functionalism? The real mystery is where has my knowlege evaporated to, and can I use that preposition to end that clause? I think this Flannery guy has joined me in going the Leonard Tose route!

January 25, 2006 12:49 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

That's Flannery GAL to you, bub.

January 25, 2006 1:00 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Well excuuuuuuuussseee me, Sinead.

January 25, 2006 1:46 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I have now shaved my head, and I'm braying some tuneless song while tearing up a picture of you in a Pope hat.

January 25, 2006 11:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 24, 2006


Poem of the Day

This Living Hand

This living hand, now warm and capable
Of earnest grasping, would, if it were cold
And in the icy silence of the tomb,
So haunt thy days and chill thy dreaming nights
That thou wouldst wish thine own heart dry of blood
So in my veins red life might stream again,
And thou be conscience-calmed—see here it is—
I hold it towards you.

John Keats

13 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Ugh. That's sounds vaguely creepy.

January 24, 2006 4:48 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Is Living Hand a cousin or Justice Learned Hand? Just wondering.

January 24, 2006 6:38 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I wonder how Keats would have reacted to the prospecct of his very own peanut gallery?

January 24, 2006 1:42 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Keats me!

January 24, 2006 1:58 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

I wonder if Tom Lehrer was thinking of this poem when he wrote his song "I Hold Your Hand in Mine"?

January 24, 2006 3:28 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I think he is describing The Hand That Rocks The Cradle well in advance of the invention of film. Very prescient.

January 24, 2006 4:22 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Daryl Ann, I think my favorite is "The Eve of Saint Agnes." Leave it to you to fall in love with dead poets, though -- I saved my love for fictional characters. At least they're still alive.

Jeff, who on earth is that and are you a big fan? The song *was* kinda funny.

January 25, 2006 12:53 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Tom Lehrer was a Harvard mathematician who had a brief career as a piano-playing comedian during the late 1950s/early 1960s. He put out three or four albums before returning to academia. (At the time, he was considered a bit risque; now, his humor seems witty and sophisticated.) I think he still teaches somewhere in California.

If you ever saw the 1970s kids' show "Electric Company" on PBS, you may have heard a couple of his songs for children: "Silent E" or "-ly."

January 25, 2006 7:40 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Oh, my gosh, I remember both those songs!

January 25, 2006 8:10 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Funny how what's considered risque for one generation gets reclassified as witty for another. Maybe Wedding Crashers will be considered a witty and urbane comedy at mid-century, and then I won't feel slightly guilty for having laughed at it.

January 25, 2006 10:43 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

KM, you're giving your (young) age away saying you know Electric Company but not Tom Lehrer. Bet you don't know Phil Ochs, either. Tsk tsk.

January 25, 2006 10:53 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

CIV, I'm old enough to be happy to be accused of being young ...

January 25, 2006 11:09 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I remember Phil Ochs, but I'm sure that wouldn't interest anybody, outside of a small circle of friends.

January 25, 2006 11:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 23, 2006


Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto!

George Galloway -- in his appearance on the Beeb's Big Brother -- may not not be getting his political message across as clearly as he'd hoped, but he's certainly doing his best to express "'the emotions of bewilderment when a small puppy won't come to you' through the medium of robotic dance."

Update: Video here.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Canada to make right turn; Moore to binge

Don't look now but our friends to the north are actually about to elect a conservative PM. Guess who's distressed by this?

Hide the Hostess donuts. Mr. Moore will binging again to help get through yet another conservative election victory.

1 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

I'm buying stock in Krispy Kreme.

January 24, 2006 4:48 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Today's Propaganda Quiz

Stewdog had a propaganda class in High School and 2 courses at the college level, so he can usually smell a rat at 50 paces. This love fest piece on Nancy Pelosi, masquerading as news, is a classic. If you get bored today, take a gander and see what techniques are in play here.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Daylight Come. . .

. . . And Me Go Nutz-o. Prickly City takes a stab at Harry Belafonte.
Meanwhile, Harry is busy playing "The N Card", the modern day last refuge of scoundrels.

3 Comments:

Blogger Wonderdog said...

That cat bears a striking resemblance to WD and Scotty's "Jinx" here at home. For a second, my heart had hope that someone had finally taken him off our hands.

January 23, 2006 10:12 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

By comparing DHS to the Gestapo, Harry B. is giving our government far more credit for efficiency and effectiveness than it deserves.

If I were a Hollywood agent, I'd warn my clients to be careful about what they say--not because the government might punish them, but because in the past five years, the press has moved from reporting celebrity political rants as newsworthy to gleefully reporting them for their absurd entertainment value. I don't think most celebrities have noticed the change.

January 23, 2006 10:30 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Harry B has. . ah. . gone the Leonard Tose Route.

January 23, 2006 10:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 20, 2006


Pink shenanigans

Yeah, this misappropriation by Code Pink is despicable but you almost can't blame them. Whose face would you rather market for your organization, this attractive young woman's or Cindy Sheehan's?

3 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Wonderdog, if you are going to mention CS, that is "Saint Cindy, Mother Cindy, or Our Lady Of Casey". HOW DARE YOU!
Then again, there is something to like about Code Pink. Their website features this diatribe and directive regarding Clinton Lite:
"Bird-Dog Hillary!
The American people are saying, ‘Troops out,’ Iraqi people are saying, ‘Troops out.’ Are you listening, Hillary? CODEPINK has launched a nationwide campaign against Hillary Clinton because of her opposition to immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq. We plan to tail the senator around the state and the country to persuade her to oppose the war. Our protests in Chicago, Washington D.C, and New York have generated a buzz in the media."

January 21, 2006 6:05 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

That is despicable and laughable at the same time. What was with the photo-shopping? They wanted her to be smiling? And then they changed the photo after the entire blogosphere had seen the original? Oy.

January 21, 2006 10:36 AM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

Forgive me, Stewdog -- Our Lady of Perpetual Protests. How's that?

As for the Hillary pillorying, I have my suspicions. I truly believe that there is a vast left wing conspiracy to make Ms. Rodham appear as centrist as possible to get her elected and that certain fringe leftist organizations are doing their part to conjure that image.

KM, don't know what was up with the photo-shopping. It's just bizarre, weird and typical freakishness from the far left. I think maybe that's Streisand's mouth.

January 21, 2006 5:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


What's the matter with Democrats?

Ross Douthat comments on an American Prospect article by Garance Franke-Ruta which suggests why and how "heartland" voters, who are presumably sympathetic to at least some of the Democrat's economic policies, pull the lever for Republicans. As Douthat says, "it's the culture, stupid." In a way, Franke-Ruta's position, and Douthat's analysis of it, reach the same conclusion that Theodore Dalrymple and others have reached with regard to the rampant libertarianism -- sexual, social, moral -- that was unleashed in my favorite decade: it was a disaster for the underclass and those on its margins. Those who are better educated and financially better off talk a good game about "liberation" of most kinds -- some of them aren't so keen on free markets -- but when it comes down to it, they tend to settle into more traditional arrangements, especially when it occurs to them to have children. Heartland voters have gone Republican, according to Douthat, because of "cultural aspirations," which is an aspect of self-interest that some on the left have failed to come to terms with. They want what the other guy's got, but they aren't primarily thinking about money; they want to live in communites which promote values and ideals that they see as beneficial to themselves and their families, and they respond to Republicans because they are at least willing to pay lip service to those ideals (and some of them, of course, actually believe in those ideals).

There's a slight rift on the right about this issue, because Republican libertarianism is also implicated in Douthat's and Franke-Ruta's analysis. I'm siding more and more with the Cruncy Cons in my old age.

5 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

This post has be remembering a comment that I think was posted by Jeff a while back. Voters don't necessarily pull the lever for Republicans because they embrace the candidate or his or her platform so much as the alternative is just so repulsive, time and again.

January 20, 2006 2:11 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

shopping at agriculture co-ops and rejecting suburban sprawl

Ugh. If that's crunchy, make mine smooth and creamy. Give me Costco and give me a big yard.

January 20, 2006 5:41 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

This is off topic, but necessary:

Scotty, the riddle's "submit" button just returned a "Proxy Error." Also, please check the Rumpus mailbag. Thanks.

January 21, 2006 10:59 AM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

CIV, per Scotty, she got the email. We're gonna post that on the blog. Thanks!

She's gonna fix the Rumpus Riddle glitch but...why on earth are you submitting an answer to that riddle that's been there many a blue moon?

January 21, 2006 4:50 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Hey, WD, I like to win!

Actually, I sometimes use that riddle space to secretly contact the elusive Scotty. Oops. That was our secret.

Say "hey" to Scotty for me. Hope she and the pups are doing well.

January 22, 2006 9:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


That Lucky CIV

That would be our Conservative In Virginia, who is a regular commenter on this blog. Why is this person so lucky? Because Virginia is nearer to DC than we are out here on the left coast and The Conservative will be able to go witness the March on the 4th of February. I first heard about it today from Laura. This wonderful rally is sponsered by a level headed organization which states in its website that they will take their demand that Bush step down to the White House. "This regime is immoral, dangerous, and criminally indictable. Bush Lied. Bush Spied. Bush Step Down. 2006. 2008. Too late. Turn your outrage into mass political action." I don't know about you, but that kind of talk has me checking air fares to hear the reasoned commentary of Cindy Sheehan, Harry Belafonte, Ed Asner, Jane Fonda and the usual suspects. Yawn!

4 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

Disregard that "Huh." I put it up before the rest of your post was published, I guess.

Yes, C.I.V *and* Jeff. Here's your chance to turn your outrage into mass political action.

January 20, 2006 2:03 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Yes, and Jeff and Toto too! Didn't mean to forget his invitation to this scream fest. Perhaps if he went by "Jeff in DC" I wouldn't have missed it.

January 20, 2006 2:59 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Hey, hey, CIA! Victory to MPLA!

Wait, are they still in business? Hmmm. Not sure. Wait! I know:

Hey, hey, LBJ.How many kids did you kill today?

The people. United. Will never be defeated.


Now where's my bandanna? Or would a Che beret be better? And where did I put that little Red book? Far out, man!

Stewdog, I'll pick you up at Ronald Reagan Facist National airport by the Amerikkkan Airline counter.

January 20, 2006 5:26 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

That's the spirit CIV.
1 2 3 4 We don't want your stupid war.
5 6 7 8 Birkinstocks and Volvos. . .GREAT!
Cue to Joan Baez:
"I dreamed I saw
Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
Said I to Joe
You're 10 years dead
Just Like I wish Cheney."

January 21, 2006 5:59 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


A Great Political Thinker

Who Knew? And a Star Jones shall lead them.

2 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

She even suggested that Bush hold some kind of talk with the man behind 9/11.

That's a great idea. Osama, just give President Bush a call. Maybe use a satellite phone and talk a really, really long time.

January 20, 2006 1:32 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

The suggestion that Bush and Bin Laden stand on equal footing in this situation is just laughable.

January 20, 2006 1:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Another Reason To Dislike George Clooney

As if we needed one. . . I missed his crack about Abramoff at the Golden Globes, but Jack's father didn't.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 19, 2006


Shocking, Just Shocking!

Senators Leahy and Kennedy have voiced their opposition to Samuel Alito for SCOTUS. What is this world coming to?
Meanwhile, Clinton Lite comes out swinging and criticizes the Administration for downplaying the threat of Iran. It must be exhausting being Hilary. Stading for nothing, checking which way the wind blows everyday, and letting the polls and politics dictate every statement.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Life's little ironies

Back in the days when I had to take naps, I never wanted to take naps.

1 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

I have figured out that once you pass 30, you enter The Years Of Napping Dangerously.

January 19, 2006 12:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Neither Barry nor Johnson

But there is another Lyndon. . .Lyndon Larouche. I hadn't heard of this crackpot in years and had given the name no thought, but today, his minions were out at 3 subway entrances that I saw, giving out a publication that reeks of the worst in propaganda and name calling. One of the troops said as he handed it out "Let's send the fascists Cheny and Alito back to hell". Wow! Talk about raising the level of discourse. I refused the publication and shouted back "Support the President". I did see one on the ground, and braving all sorts of bacteria, picked it up and perused it. Just horrible stuff. Equating Alito with Hitler. Give me a break!

2 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Wow, tonight is really a blast from the past. Who'd a thunk ol' Lyndon was still alive? I wonder if he's still living in Virginia?

Many moons ago during the dark days of malaise, I got a leaflet from one of his zombies. It said, in all seriousness, that President Carter (it pains me to pair those words) had a secret plan to bomb... America! Yes, Carter was going to bomb half of the USA (unhelpfully, it didn't say which half) in order to solve the energy, population, and unemployment problems.

I take it that we are only here today because Lyndon saved us all by exposing Carter's nasty plans.

January 20, 2006 5:36 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

JC had to settle on bombing our Olympic Athletes. That one still sticks in my craw. If Carter had been our president in '36, Jesse Owens never would have been able to show up the Third Reich and expose the Nazi's sick racial theories of white surpremecy for the hideous crap that it was!

January 21, 2006 6:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Nihil sub sole novum

I remembered this post from Unlocked Wordhoard last night, when I picked up The Kite Runner -- a novel my husband had been urging me to read -- and glanced at the first three pages. I put the book down, looked over at my husband, and, after a preliminary "Ummmmmm," I proceeded to explain how the plot twists, or rather untwists, and how the story ends. I could tell by the look on his face that I had nailed it.

I'll read the book anyway, of course. As Richard Scott Nokes points out, a story that follows a well-trodden narrative path is as likely to be a very good story as it is to be a bad one. There aren't many really new stories in the world, but so what? The old ones -- many-hued, sinuous, shape-shifting -- have stood me in good stead all these years.

Who, for instance, among those who survived the first twenty minutes or so of Moulin Rouge!, didn't know how the story was going to end? I was undaunted by knowing the ending, because I was still curious about how the story was going to make me care about the ending. That's something that always happens -- if it happens at all -- along the way, and it is along the way that the really good stories, however old, become new again.

8 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Ha-rumph. Tell me you knew you'd see the Statue of Liberty at the end of Planet of the Apes.

January 19, 2006 4:37 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

This is great. KM gives away the Kite Runner and Moulon Rouge, adn then CIV gives away Planet Of The Apes. I guess I need to read books and watch movies when they first come out.

January 19, 2006 7:18 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

CIV, of *course* I didn't know I'd see the Statue of Liberty at the end of the Planet of the Apes, but then ... I was only a child when I first saw it. I'd like to think that, nowadays, I'd have guessed the general outline of the ending at least from the moment that doll said "Mama!" But that was a great ending, wasn't it? G-d them! They did it! They finally did it!

You'll notice I was careful not to give anything away, Stewdog. And are you yanking my chain, or have you really never seen Planet of the Apes?

January 19, 2006 8:16 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I'm just monkeying around with you.

January 19, 2006 9:31 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

In that case ...

Get your stinking hands off me, you damned dirty ape!

January 19, 2006 9:35 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Excuse me ... that should read "paws," not "hands."

January 19, 2006 9:44 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Hey, I did guess the end of Soylent Green. It was near the end, but still I felt proud of my self. (OK, so I lived a sad little life as a teenager.)

January 20, 2006 1:28 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I don't want to know how The Crying Game Ends.

January 20, 2006 3:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 18, 2006


Poem of the Day

Mirror In February

The day dawns with scent of must and rain,
Of opened soil, dark trees, dry bedroom air.
Under the fading lamp, half dressed, -- my brain
Idling on some compulsive fantasy --
I towel my shaven lip and stop, and stare,
Riveted by a dark exhausted eye,
A dry downturning mouth.

It seems again that it is time to learn,
In this untiring, crumbling place of growth
To which, for the time being, I return.
Now plainly in the mirror of my soul
I read that I have looked my last on youth
And little more; for they are not made whole
That reach the age of Christ.

Below my window the awakening trees,
Hacked clean for better bearing, stand defaced
Suffering their brute necessities,
And how should the flesh not quail that span for span
Is mutilated more? In slow distaste
I fold my towel with what grace I can,
Not young and not renewable, but man.

-- Thomas Kinsella

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Thanks for the reminder. . .must purchase Edge Shaving Gel and prune the trees.

January 18, 2006 9:18 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

OOPS. . my pledge not to make fun of KM's poetry postings lasted all of 18 days into the new year. Oh well, now that the seal is broken, I should just have at it.
NIHIL STEWDOG ET QUORUM HABITAS EST DELECTIBUS DECORUM NON DEBILIO

January 19, 2006 12:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Liberals and Iran

Daniel Drezner comments.

(Via Andrew Sullivan)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


The Marriage Gap

Kay Hymowitz writes about the marriage gap and about the ways in which "liberating" cultural trends trap poorer and less educated women and their children in a cycle of poverty:

For one thing, women who grow up in a marriage-before-children culture organize their lives around a meaningful and beneficial life script. Traditional marriage gives young people a map of life that takes them step by step from childhood to adolescence to college or other work training—which might well include postgraduate education—to the workplace, to marriage, and only then to childbearing. A marriage orientation also requires a young woman to consider the question of what man will become her husband and the father of her children as a major, if not the major, decision of her life. In other words, a marriage orientation demands that a woman keep her eye on the future, that she go through life with deliberation, and that she use self-discipline—especially when it comes to sex: bourgeois women still consider premature pregnancy a disaster. In short, a marriage orientation—not just marriage itself—is part and parcel of her bourgeois ambition.

When Americans announced that marriage before childbearing was optional, low-income women didn’t merely lose a steadfast partner, a second income, or a trusted babysitter, as the strength-in-numbers theory would have it. They lost a traditional arrangement that reinforced precisely the qualities that they-and their men; let’s not forget the men!—needed for upward mobility, qualities all the more important in a tough new knowledge economy. The timing could hardly have been worse. At a time when education was becoming crucial to middle-class status, the disadvantaged lost a reliable life script, a way of organizing their early lives that would prize education and culminate in childbearing only after job training and marriage. They lost one of their few institutional supports for planning ahead and taking control of their lives.

Worst of all, when Americans made marriage optional, low-income women lost a culture that told them the truth about what was best for their children. A number of researchers argue that, in fact, low-income women really do want to marry. They have “white picket dreams,” say Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas in Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage, and though the men in their lives cannot turn those dreams into reality, they continue to gaze longingly into the distance at marriage as a symbol of middle-class stability and comfort. What they don’t have, however, is a clue about the very fact that orders the lives of their more fortunate peers: marriage and childbearing belong together. The result is separate and unequal families, now and as far as the eye can see.

Read the whole thing.

1 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Good piece, KM... even though I had to google the Latin at the end.

I haven't used any Latin since 2nd or 3rd grade. Even then, I only knew how to mumble the minimum for Mass. The nuns didn't seem to think we needed to actually know what we were saying.

January 19, 2006 4:35 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


There's that darned double standard again

"This city will remain a vanilla city."

"This city will remain mostly white because that's the way God wants it to be."

How long after making such imbecilic remarks would the white politician who made them have before he was forced to make his resignation speech? An hour? Maybe two? And rightly so.

So why is it different when it's a black politician saying the opposite? The answer is as racial as the remarks themselves -- because he's black.

I loved this attempt to cover his assinine comments:

"I want everyone to be welcome in New Orleans -- black, white, Asian, everybody,"

You know, blacks, whites...them asian types with the squinty eyes. Everyone.

Hispanics best stay out of town just to be safe.

4 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

Hey, Wonderdog! Put your feet up. Stay a while.

January 18, 2006 1:11 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

WD, Nagin later explained, “How do you make chocolate? You take dark chocolate, you mix it with white milk and it becomes a delicious drink. That is the chocolate I am talking about.”

So maybe Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, et al are the nutmeg on top?

January 18, 2006 8:35 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I'm the marshmello

January 18, 2006 8:52 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Hilarious, CIV. So he was just a little imprecise -- he really meant he wants New Orleans to be a milk chocolate city again.

January 18, 2006 3:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Lindsay Davenport: "I am turning into Sally Field...



...and I'm not sure what to do about it."

1 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

Don't worry, Lindsay. We like you. We really like you!

January 17, 2006 11:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 17, 2006


From the "too cool to make an argument" files

Shorter Ariel Dorfman: Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.

3 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Those Modern Language people are obviously all Bush haters who believe everything MoveOn tells them.

January 18, 2006 8:39 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Dorfman writes:

The sadder truth is that I can imagine an epilogue to my story.

The United States is hit by an even more devastating and lethal terrorist attack.

On that day, can I confidently say that there will not be a knock at my door and that two men, one tall and gangly, the other short and beefy, will not ask me if I recall spreading lies about their efforts to fight the war on terrorism? And that they will not demand that I accompany them, just for a few hours, for some routine questioning?


I can confidently say it: If and when there is another massive attack by Islamic terrorists, Argentinian-born academics and novelists won't exactly be the government's highest priority. Talk about ego...

January 18, 2006 10:44 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

It's really kind of mind-boggling, isn't it?

January 18, 2006 11:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Significant SCOTUS Ruling

In a 6-3 ruling, the US Supreme Court has upheld Oregon's assisted suicide law in face of a challenge that had been started by John Ashcroft.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Those Wacky Dems!

The Sage Of Chappiquiddick is outed as having membership in a "No Girls Allowed" Club and has to quit. Then Hillary is about to break into a rousing chorus of Old Man River when discussing the House yesterday.

2 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

That TK thing is hilarious. My favorite quote was "I'm not a member; I continue to pay $100 ..."

January 17, 2006 1:11 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

You gotta love Ted. On a slow Dem bashing day, he will always give you some material. He's just classic.

January 17, 2006 1:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Useless Idiots

Meow.

4 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

I saw that. This guy is beyond being a king jerk.
On another note, I caught the end of San Fran Nan's town hall meeting on CSPAN. I thougt I was watching the House of Commons, with anti war freaks yelling throughout. . You reap what you so, Ms. Pelosi.

January 17, 2006 9:38 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

The weirdest thing about the UK "Big Brother" is that it's on the BBC all the time. It airs several hours a day, even if the housemates are doing nothing, but each day is also recapped by a host before a live studio audience each night and by the folks on the morning chat shows the next day, plus by the print media.

The Brits should be awfully glad that such drivel (which makes our own reality series seem like Shakespeare by comparison) doesn't get shown on BBC outlets worldwide; the world would have an entirely different and much less complimentary set of stereotypes about them.

January 17, 2006 4:39 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Jeff, I had no idea Big Brother was that huge in the UK. Maybe I shouldn't have scoffed at Galloway's spokesman's suggestion that he went on the show to get his political message across. I guess I *was* overestimating the Brits in a complimentary way.

January 17, 2006 8:19 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

I think most Americans are inclined to overestimate Brits in a complimentary way. They're lucky we do! A few weeks of unfiltered British television would convince most Americans of the sad truth of much of what Theodore Dalrymple writes.

I never thought I'd say this, but after my visit to the UK last year, I can state that I feel much safer and more comfortable in New York City or D.C. at night than I generally did in London, Cambridge, or Canterbury during the day. It's not that there was anything in particular I can point to, but there was just an eerie feeling about those cities. Unfortunately, it was familiar: It reminded me of the weird, feral feeling of many American cities during the late 1970s. The Brits do have some bad times ahead.

January 17, 2006 8:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Overheard while watching Star Wars with a 4-year-old

* "Is there a Life Star?"

* "That water is. So. Gross."

* "That's not a walking carpet. That's Chewbacca!" [accompanied by uncontrollable giggling]

* "Why does Obi Wan disappear?"

* "Does Han care?"

* "He shouldn't be saying 'Yeaaahhhh!' He should be saying, like, 'Noooooooooo!'"

By the way, I hereby disclaim any responsibility for the "like, [quote]" construction. I may be a native Southern Californian, but I'm from the other valley. And while the girls are movie watchers -- they're usually allowed one a night -- they do not watch commercial television at our house. I suspect that the Disney Channel, which they get to watch when they are with their adoring and indulgent grandparents, is the culprit. I think Disney is also behind the "Yeah, girl!" which sometimes punctuates the triumph of winning a race or getting their way. At least neither of them has begun that peculiar uptalk which is the mark of the true Valley Girl and the annoying affectation of all Valley Girl wannabes. I'm being unfair to the wannabes, though, since the original mode of conversation was already an affectation.

Can you imagine Princess Leia as a Valley Girl? "Help me, Obi Wan Kenobi? You're, like, my only hope?"

1 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

And what, like, pray tell is WRONG with a Valley Girl? I, like, raised two of them, like you know and they are totally cool.

January 17, 2006 9:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 16, 2006


Monday Musings

Once again, the death penalty is on the front page with the impending execution of Clarence Ray Allen. Funny, but the same "activists" who were vocal about Tookie's execution are remarkably silent. But I digress. Allen is 76 and infirm, and some are arguing that it is cruel to execute a person in his state. Although I have my concerns about the death penalty, both on moral and economic grounds, this argument is just silly. He's old and infirm because our system allowed him to drag out endless appeals. It is akin to a parent murderer throwing himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.

On a lighter note, the Times posed the question to many in LA about how they would improve our fair city. I really like Sandra Tsing Loh and got a kick out of her comment:
"L.A.'s most sought-after private schools (ones that teach such estimable values as peaceful conflict resolution, global citizenship and honoring diversity) now cost $15,000 to $20,000 a year. If just 35 L.A. private school kindergarteners braved the wilds of public kindergarten for one year, the saved tuition money could be used to support Access Books, a nonprofit that provides books to underfunded L.A.-area schools. Because this outside-the-box approach provides such a fresh twist onthe community service line in the Harvard application, I think this one-year "Outward Bound From Private School Kindergarten" program could be a win/win."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, January 15, 2006


San Fran Nan

Love this story on Nancy Pelosi. Seems the darling of the left has to walk a tightrope between appeasing her whacky left base while not appearing too liberal and turning off the moderate voters.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Powerful Catholics or the power of Catholicism?

Here's a very interesting article by Joseph Bottum in the Weekly Standard about the rise of Catholic intellectuals, and the flowering of an intellectually and philosophically rigorous Catholicism, in the post-Roe political landscape. The Catholic intellectual tradition is waaay older than 1973, of course, but Bottum suggests that the post-Roe moment in American history has required pro-lifers to articulate the philosophical underpinnings of their position and that Catholic intellectuals have gone prominently unto the breach.

(Via Amy Welborn)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Morning Musings

Although the critics savaged them, I actually enjoyed Deuce Bigelow Male Gigolo and The Animal. These were two movies with Rob Schneider that had some funny scenes that brought me to tears. So I took a gander last night on the Deuce remake. Let me state unequivocally that this is the worst piece of trash I have ever seen. Hollywood has a way with remakes. They take a movie that had something going for it and then just beat that to death. I disagreed with the critics who liked Grizzly Man, but am in lock step with them on this.

Took a gander on an Aussie wine last night and am going back for a case tody. Rosemount Orange Vineyard Shiraz 2001. It's a 20 dollar wine you can get at Bevmo for 10 if you have one of their cards. A real treat, this, mate.

Read a blurb in the sports page that mentioned Laura Nyro. She died young of cancer, but was a prolific songwriter who has to go in the 'underrated' column. She was a good performer, but her strength was in songwriting. Some of the songs she wrote that you may know include Eli's Coming, Wedding Bell Blues, Flim Flam Man, Blowin' Away, Stoney End, And When I Die, Stoned Soul Picnic, and Save The Country.

That's it folks. Out for my workout and then time to chip away at Mr. 1040 while watching some football today.

2 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

I hereby dub thee official Rumpus wine critic.

Thanks for the tribute to Laura Nyro. I hadn't heard of her, but Wedding Bell Blues is one of those songs I always sing along with when I hear it on the radio.

January 15, 2006 7:25 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I gladly accept that mantle, KM. I'm well prepared for the job. All my life, people have told me to "put a cork in it".
As to Laura Nyro, the fact you hadn't heard of her bolsters my assertion that she is an "underrated". She rivals Carol King as a songwriter, yet few today know her.

January 15, 2006 7:57 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, January 14, 2006


Cagey

I recently learned from Darryl Ann that there is currently in progress the performance of a musical piece by the composer John Cage that will last 639 years. The performance is taking place in Halberstadt, Germany.

The piece moves slowly. The first year and a half of the piece was silence. A new note is scheduled to be played in the next month or so. Apparently, Cage first wrote the piece to be played in a time span of about twenty minutes on the piano. The piece was then adapted for organ with the tempo slowed down -- WAY down. A new, special, organ is being built to play some notes of the piece scheduled to sound some years from now.

I'm really not making this up.

I am familiar with a few works by John Cage, and have actually performed one of them for an audience on the piano: 4'33". In case you haven't "heard" it or of it, I will tell you that this piece is 4 minutes and 33 seconds of silence. (The piece has also been successfully performed by orchestras, singers, and chamber groups. As you might imagine, very little rehearsal is needed). The piece is actually pretty affecting -- especially if you don't know what's coming.

As for the piece scheduled to last 639 years, part of me just loves it although I haven't yet had the opportunity to hear a single note. The months of anticipation before each new note is sounded, the intergenerational effort required to complete the performance, the generous pauses between notes permitting contemplation of what has come before and what is to come -- who could demand more from any piece of art?

Of course another part of me thinks: what a load of you know what. But hey.

20 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

I'm . . .

January 15, 2006 12:21 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

vaguely . . .

January 15, 2006 12:22 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

remembering ...

January 15, 2006 12:22 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

a quote ...

January 15, 2006 12:22 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

...

January 15, 2006 12:23 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I read ...

January 15, 2006 12:23 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

somewhere ...

January 15, 2006 12:24 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

that conceptual art ...

January 15, 2006 12:24 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

is a kind of art which, ...

January 15, 2006 12:25 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

once you understand the concept, ...

January 15, 2006 12:25 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

you ...

January 15, 2006 12:25 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

needn't ...

January 15, 2006 12:26 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

actually ...

January 15, 2006 12:26 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

...

January 15, 2006 12:26 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

experience.

January 15, 2006 12:28 AM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

[I collapse in exhaustion. Wild applause and shouts of "Brava!" resound in the blogosphere for months on end.]

January 15, 2006 12:29 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

How thick must the sheet music be for that 600 Plus year piece? You have to account for all the space and silence.

January 15, 2006 6:44 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Sounds like Foundation, but less fun.

January 15, 2006 9:10 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

I'm with Kate Marie on this one: much conceptual art seriously insults its audience. I don't know what John Cage wants me to learn from his 639-year concert--a better understanding of the passage of time, perhaps, or a reminder of the role that time plays in the creation of music--but whatever it is, I can probably grasp it with less of an investment in time and money on the part of his crew. Or does he think I can't?

On the other hand, anything that keeps the Germans safely preoccupied for several centuries can't be all bad.

January 15, 2006 9:07 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Amen to that, my friend.

January 15, 2006 10:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Desiderata

In the 60's and 70's, popular culture embraced not only JRRT and his Rings, but also The Desiderata, a poem we all know way too well. I hadn't thought about it for years until I saw it on the wall of my coffee store this morning. It made me remember the National Lampoon parody of it. See both the parody and the original here.
The copy I saw also contained the legend that it was found in a church in the 17th century. That myth is debunked here.

12 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

Call me sappy, but I've always kinda liked that Desiderata poem--not because it's a good poem, which is really kinda isn't, but as a worthy plea for patience and thoughtfulness. (I also never overdosed on it during the 70s, although there were few bathrooms in New Jersey that didn't have that treacly poem: "Footprints"? "Footsteps"? Whatever it's called...)

January 14, 2006 7:26 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

OK, You're Sappy!

It has it's benefits and positives, but it was just overdone. I can't help but be cynical about it now.

January 14, 2006 9:24 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

At this point, I figure my sappiness is common knowledge in this corner of the blogosphere. :)

January 14, 2006 9:34 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Nonsense. Your comments are always welcome and appreciated. Maybe we are all saps, so if you are a sap. . well, it could be a maple syrup fest.

January 14, 2006 10:09 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I'm a proud member of the Sap Club. I applaud us for having the courage of our sappiness.

Speaking of The Desiderata, I remember having to *sing* it when I took chorus in high school. Sister Sue (yes, she was really called Sister Sue) always followed a pretty hippie repertoire.

January 14, 2006 11:40 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

And by the way, how could you lump Tolkien in with that?

January 15, 2006 12:17 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

KM, is that a rhetorical question? I'm not comparing Mr. Bored Of The Rings with The Sappy Poem. I was just pointing out that both JRRT and Des found rebirth in 60's culture. So did Peyote and bell bottoms, but I don't equate them.

January 15, 2006 6:47 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Bell bottoms found rebirth in the 60's? You mean we didn't invent them?

January 15, 2006 4:15 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Don't you think the boomers really ought to take to heart at least this line:

"Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth."

I mean, enough with the Botox and face lifts already. Get a rocking chair and get over it.

January 15, 2006 4:15 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

CIV, I wouldn't consider Botox to be a thing of youth to surrender. I think they are referring to pot, driving too fast, dating fast women, drinking cheap beer, staying out all night, listening to loud music, liking stupid movies etc.

January 15, 2006 9:23 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Stewdog, Botox was just my shorthand for saying what you said. I mean, check out Marion Barry. Still with the crack and the criminals and who knows what. Rolling Stones still can't get no satisfaction? JFKerry's got to have a smooth face that looks like it might crack. Madonna thinking she's still 20.

You don't have to go directly from 50 to a rocking chair, but 50 is NOT 20 and 60 is NOT 30 and growing old isn't the worst thing that can happen to you.

January 16, 2006 6:12 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Right on, CIV! I think it's much worse to grow old without growing up.

January 17, 2006 1:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 13, 2006


"Re-viewing the Russian Movies"

"I had seen most of these movies at one time or another, but none of them for at least fifteen years, and I went this time looking very consciously for the pathos and irony of that enormous historical failure which now weighs so dangerously on us all. Irony, God knows, was easy enough to find; every glimpse of the enthusiasms of that revolution brings forth all at once the whole wearisome joke of human aspiration and wickedness -- we shall be having it dinned into our ears, in just this form, until we die. There was more irony than the most avid of paradox-mongers could possibly want. Only to see the word 'comrades' or the word 'workers' in a subtitle was enough. Before I was through I could no longer even understand why our age insists on finding the idea of irony so attractive. I would have given up all ironies, and the sense of tragedy and the sense of history along with them, just to have stupid, handsome Nicholas grinding his heel once more into the face of unhappy Russia.

Pathos was another matter. For pathos there must be victims, and in five of these six movies the glare of triumphant righteousness is so blinding that one can't see any victims at all, only a few martyrs of the working class, their lives well expended, and a few bourgeois or monarchist anachronisms, swept properly into the dustbin of history. No death is without meaning; even that baby hurtling in its carriage down the Odessa steps in Potemkin is part of the great plan, and the spectacle is exciting but not saddening. Of course it could be said that Eisenstein and Pudovkin and Dovzhenko were the real victims, ultimately betrayed by the revolution they celebrated; but that idea, if it is important at all, becomes important only on reflection. It is hard to feel the pathos of their lives when you see them playing with corpses; if they had got the chance, they would have made a handsome montage of my corpse too, and given it a meaning -- their meaning and not mine."

-- Robert Warshow, "Re-viewing the Russian Movies," in The Immediate Experience

1 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Bread, Peace, Land!

January 13, 2006 2:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


The Mouse That Roared

Quite a story this. A guy in New Mexico catches a mouse in his home. Decides to dispose of it by throwing it alive in a burning pile of leaves. His cruelty was rewarded when the mouse ran out of the pile and back into the house, setting the house on fire and destroying it.
There is justice in this world after all.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


I Walked That Line

Stewwife is an actor/actress/actorperson who gets to attend free screenings of nominated films. Last night I let her drag me off the couch to the theater at the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences in North Hollywood. The Leonard Goldenson Theatre is beautiful and has great acoustics. In addition to the event being free of charge, thus fitting into Stewdog's budget, there was no popcorn noises, no kids talking, no cell phone calls, no previews, and no commercials. Great way to see a film.
Oh, to the movie. I thought that I would like this film and I did. So did most critics. The two leads were superb and the music is infectious. My only criticisms are that it ran a little long and that, like Ray, to a lesser degree, it focused too much on the negative of a great celebrity's life.
Two big paws up from Stewdog.

5 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

Do tell: what was the film?

January 13, 2006 7:48 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I'm assuming one of Stewdog's links was meant to be to Rotten Tomatoes, but I'm sure the movie was Walk the Line. Were you being sarcastic, Jeff, or are you bleary-eyed and fuzzy-headed from hours of Civ. 4? :)

January 13, 2006 8:52 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

No sarcasm intended! Besides, I haven't purchased Civ 4. I'm resisting, because I'm too busy these days, and I'd rather not emerge with a Howard-Hughes beard and crazy-dude fingernails after six sleepless weeks of simulated warfare...

January 13, 2006 10:51 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Walk the line it was.
Just finished watching Cinderalla Man. Why is it that nothing makes great movies like boxing.
Russell Crowe is, as always, fantastic, as was Bart Giamannti's kid.
You can have Rene Zellwagger, wigger, or whatever. Should have been hit by a truck after Jerry McGwire. KM's sister is right. She always looks like she just smelled dog poop.

January 13, 2006 10:55 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

I've never actually played one of those Civilization games. It sounds like something I'd want to keep my husband from ever discovering!

January 13, 2006 11:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Where Have You Gone Aunt Jemima?

Well, she recently showed up at a Jacksonville City Council meeting, but has been banned for being disruptive. I'm frankly comforted to see her sporting the "do-rag" once again. Why is it that NFL and NBA players can sport it, but our dear Aunty can't? She received a makeover in the recent past, and she doesn't look the same. For some history of this cultural icon, go here.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


The Leonard Tose Route

Kate Marie has suggested that I explain the Leonard Tose references, and I herein comply. Leonard Tose was, at one time, the owner of the Philadelphia Eagles. He had it all and lost it because of gambling and drinking. There used to be a great radio show in LA where the host, Jim Healy, played clips in a humorous manner. One that was often used was describing someone who had gone "The Leonard Tose Route". The expression has gotten into the vernacular of sports talk and a So Cal sports fan over 30 will know immediately what you mean if you use the expression (Just like a hockey fan will know that "Have another donut you fat pig" refers to an incident with Don Koharsky, but that is another blog).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 12, 2006


Hello? Helloo-oooooooooooo!

Why yes, we'd love to have Santa Claus come and stay with us!

3 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Er. . .KM. . was there supposed to be a link in there? Have you gone the Leonard Tose Route with us?

January 12, 2006 10:36 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

No, Stewdog, no link. It's a reference to Miracle on 34th Street. To be honest, I was just sitting here wondering what it would be like to blog drunk, and that scene from Miracle on 34th Street occurred to me, and I thought, if I were blogging drunk, that's the sort of thing I would post.

Does that mean I've gone the Leonard Tose route? I blog. You decide.

That reminds me -- one day you or Wonderdog should explain to our ten readers what the Leonard Tose route actually *is.*

January 12, 2006 11:05 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

There, I added a link if it makes you feel any better.

January 12, 2006 11:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 11, 2006


Shaking My Head

I just got up and left the room after trying to watch Grizzly Man, a film that critics fell over one another in praise. You gotta be kidding me! I thought I was watching another Christopher Guest send up. The bear couldn't have eaten this A Hole soon enough. The tragedy of the movie is that his ex girlfriend lived. This is a major moment in my life. Consensual validation has left me out in the cold.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Mr. Blackwell

Stewdog is in need of a diversion these days, and what better to fill it than Mr. Blackwell's annual list of the worst dressed celebs?

1. Britney Spears
2. Mary-Kate Olsen
3. Jessica Simpson
4. Eva Longoria
5. Mariah Carey
6. Paris Hilton
7. Anna Nicole Smith
8. Shakira
9. Lindsay Lohan
10. Renée Zellweger

2 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

OK, but let's be fair. Where would Stewdog rank on the Rumpus best/worst dressed list?

January 11, 2006 4:27 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I don't embarass myself. I can't afford to dress as I would choose to do. But I never wear stripes with plaid, don't wear white shoes after labor day and my ties usually match my suit and shirt.

January 11, 2006 9:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Sour Grapes Turned To Whine

This pathetic piece laments the author's disappointment that he couldn't get his slam in on the SCOTUS nominee.
Meanwhile, Hugh Hewitt continues to be a good source for commentary and links on the hearing.

Update: Check out this letter about my first comment here:

Re "The Alito testimony you won't hear," Opinion, Jan. 11 Hell hath no fury like a whiney fringe partisan scorned. While Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) often represents voices on the leftmost fringe of partisan clap-trappery, he was wise to scratch Stephen R. Dujack from the list [of witnesses to testify at the Alito hearings]. The ridiculous nature of Dujack's absurd testimony that wasn't to be would have made the more reasonable partisan opposition to Alito look foolish by association.Thus, by willingly stepping in and attempting to resuscitate Dujack's ego, The Times has compromised its own credibility and judgment.To stop the slide, I offer you the following suggestion: Next time the editors are tempted to offer The Times' distinguished forum to such pedestrian smear attempts, perhaps you should just offer the benevolent writer a bullhorn, and everyone on the editorial board who sympathizes can follow him to the street corner. KIRK TABER Roseville, Calif.

I couldn't have said it better, Kirk!

2 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

From what I've seen of the hearings, it's all just been more evidence that Republican candidates win elections these days not necessarily on their own appeal or the merits of their ideology, but because their political opponents are utterly repellent.

January 11, 2006 8:43 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

You are on to something there. Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden and the rest of these fools are just repulsive. I saw where the nominee's wife left the room in tears after hearing the suggestions that her husband is some kind of bigoted beast. Just a hideous disrepectful embarrasing charade with these fools playing to their base. Have another cocktail, Teddy Boy.

January 11, 2006 9:14 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 10, 2006


Baseball Trivia

A. Who is the only player to be elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame who has never been in a starting lineup?

A. Bruce Sutter, elected today to the Hall of Fame.

This Cardinal fan says congratulations, and thanks for the memories.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Day 2

Find a report on today's Judiciary Committee Hearings here.
Food for thought:
1. If the precedent of Roe v. Wade is so strong, and should never be overturned, why don't we still have slavery today?
2. The left hammers home that Alito is replacing Sandra Day O'Connor, so he should be a clone of her. How come that same rule didn't apply to Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Didn't she replace Byron White? And she certainly isn't a clone of anyone else (actually the thought of cloning her just made me ill).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Iran

I see the crackpots running Iran are once again thumbing their noses at the rest of the world on nuclear matters. Didn't Israel react years ago to a similar situation and take out an Iraqi facility? Keep an eye out for those blue and white bombers. Although I do see that Jacques Chirac has issued a "stern warning", so that should resolve the matter.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


A little something to brighten your day

Stefan Beck at The New Criterion scoffs at the "artificial gravity" of the new literary magazine, n+1:

What kind of person—other than a Teaching Assistant, who has no choice—would subject himself to hundreds of pages of what Keith Gessen jokingly called a “critical mass of stuff that nobody would want to publish”? Who could endure all that flashy, empty-headed prose? Only someone very keen to reassure himself that he’s wise, that he’s a step ahead of the game, that he perceives and appreciates what others cannot. The kind of person who’d happily walk the Trail of Tears from Manhattan to Red Hook just to drink Schlitz in an old factory building. A real “intellectual.”

Speaking of intellectuals: a digression, for comic relief. In college, we joked that every issue of the student literary magazine had to include at least one story that opens with a long, baroque description of the author, er, “protagonist,” lighting and smoking a cigarette. I’m pleased to note that the kids are all grown up and they’ve still got it. From Marco Roth’s fifteen-page “Last Cigarettes”:

"Boredom is a moment of danger. Cigarettes can be a way of harnessing this danger, the crisis of confidence that ensues when a writer is stuck or lonely and wonders whether his regimen is really a regimen, an honorable structure independently chosen, or, as he has doubtless heard throughout his American life, an extravagant form of shirking. He must prove everyone wrong and show what a good worker he is. Type, pause, light up, type, type, type, ash, type, inhale, type."

If boredom is a moment of danger, I just fell out a fifth-story window into an abandoned mineshaft full of quicksand.

I shouldn't laugh, though. If I ever attempted to write fiction, I'd love for it, above all, to be funny. But I'm sure any true comedy would end up being of the unintentional "Last Cigarettes" variety. So I'm not laughing at the n+1 gang; I'm laughing with them.

1 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

Thanks for the link to this. I wonder, where does that weird self-conscious style of college lit-mag writing come from? Even if students are immersed in 20th-century fiction, very little of it is obsessed with those particular conceits. Kids must pick up those writerly stereotypes from sitcoms, or maybe from somewhere else in the popular culture, but I'm not entirely sure where.

January 14, 2006 9:04 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 09, 2006


Slammin' Sammy

That's Alito, not Sosa. And what a pleasure it was seeing a Sammy before the legislative branch, sans steroids, hitting one out of the park in his opening remarks.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, or Hyanisport compound, Teddy, the Sage Of Chappiquiddick, hands shaking, dreaming of the tinkle of ice in a glass just before the booze is poured, flat out lies about Alito's record.

What a great opportunity for the Democratic Judiciary Committee members to make absolute fools of themselves once again. Still bearing the heel marks of John Roberts in their foreheads, they press ahead. Memo to Republican members of the Committee. . pass your time. This guy doesn't need your help and it is so much fun to see Shumer, Biden, Durbin, and Kennedy just implode on themselves.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


For A Fighter

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

-- Dylan Thomas

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


The Usual Suspects

This article disguists me. Harry Belafonte, Danny Glover, Cornell West, and the rest of the left wingers can say all they want here on US soil about how bad they think our leaders are, but going to Venezuala and snuggling up to Hugo "Castro with Oil" Chavez is revolting.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Do You Believe In Miracles?

I love this story out of Santa Cruz. A bus driver collecting workers comp benefits for temporary total disability was running marathons. Talking about hiding in plain sight.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Saint George

The Beatifiction of George Clooney continues. Tonight he will receive The Freedom Award on the Critics Choice awards for the liberal propaganda piece, Good Night and Turn Out The Lights, or whatever it is called. No telling if ne will need to slay any dragons to reach complete Sainthood.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, January 08, 2006


Lyric For The Day

Where To Now St. Peter?

I took myself a blue canoe
And I floated like a leaf
Dazzling, dancing
Half enchanted
In my Merlin sleep

Crazy was the feeling
Restless were my eyes
Insane they took the paddles
My arms they paralysed

So where to now St. Peter
If it's true I'm in your hands
I may not be a Christian
But I've done all one man can
I understand I'm on the road
Where all that was is gone
So where to now St. Peter
Show me which road I'm on
Which road I'm on

It took a sweet young foreign gun
This lazy life is short
Something for nothing always ending
With a bad report

Dirty was the daybreak
Sudden was the change
In such a silent place as this
Beyond the rifle range

I took myself a blue canoe


Music by Elton John Lyrics by Bernie Taupin Available on the album Tumbleweed Connection
© 1970 Dick James Music Limited

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


I'm In The Mood For Borking. . .

. . . Simple because I fear you."
The fun starts tomorrow. Bring it on. Looks like the Dems have an airtight strategy to defeat this nomination. He belonged to an organization at Princeton in which a member wrote an article that can be described as racist. Doesn't matter that HE didn't write it. Guilt by assassination.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, January 07, 2006


Quote of the day

[English textbook authors and educators ] see the world around them swayed by emotional propaganda -- they have learned from tradition that youth is sentimental -- and they conclude that the best thing they can do is to fortify the minds of young people against emotion. My own experience as a teacher tells an opposite tale. For every one pupil who needs to be guarded from a weak excess of sensibility there are three who need to be awakened from the slumber of cold vulgarity. The task of the modern educator is not to cut down jungles but to irrigate deserts. The right defence against false sentiments is to inculcate just sentiments. By starving the sensibility of our pupils we only make them easier prey to the propagandist when he comes. For famished nature will be avenged and a hard heart is no infallible protection against a soft head.

-- C. S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

1 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

More impressive when put in context. He was being chased by a lion and a witch when he wrote that.

January 08, 2006 8:45 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Iraq and Terror

Stephen Hayes in The Weekly Standard writes again about Iraq's connection with terrorists and terrorist training camps.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, January 06, 2006


Will Katrina become a fable we've all agreed upon?

Cathy Young blogs about Katrina myths and suggests that everything we thought we knew about Katrina was wrong.

(Via Instapundit)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Death Of A Salesman

That is what Ron Dedeaux was. He sold his baseball players on his program and on themselves, and as a result, his USC baseball teams won 11 National Titles during his tenure. His imprint on baseball rivals that of John Wooden on basketball. Tom Seaver, Mark McGwire, Randy Johnson, Bill "Spaceman" Lee, Dave Kingman, Ron Fairly, Fred Lynn, Roy Smalley, Don Buford, Rich Dauer, Steve Busby, Jim Barr, and Steve Kemp are some of the players he had a hand in developing, not to mention Sparky Anderson andTommy Lasorda as managers. Truly one of the great baseball managers of all time. Godspeed to you, "Tiger".

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I played against Rod Dedeaux's Trojans twice a year, each year from 1957 to 1961. Never posted a W, but we were always treated with respect by Dedeaux and his teams, who treated us like we were the Yankees coming to play. Got that "Tiger" appellation laid on me many times and proud of it. Strangely, he turned me into a USC football fan when I had not been one before.

January 06, 2006 5:19 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Great story, Canine of the Summit. The Coach seems to have had that rare gift of making everyone with whom he came in contact feel important. I'm sure that there are hundreds of similar stories of lives favorably touched by this man. Fight on, Tiger.

January 07, 2006 5:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, January 05, 2006


Days like today ...

. . . help explain why Winter is my favorite season in Southern California.

I drove with the girls up over our local hills today, and as we started down the southwest side of the hills, we could see out across Whittier and Orange County to the shining strip of the Pacific on the horizon, and beyond that, twenty six miles across the sea, the clear shape of Catalina rising.

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

And it is 37 in Boston

January 05, 2006 3:56 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

And that's balmy for them this time of year.

January 05, 2006 4:20 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Pat Robertson Please Shut Up

This guy just needs to give it a rest. God would seem to have enough on his mind without giving Sharon a stroke to punish him.

Update: Richard Scott Nokes at Unlocked Wordhoard warns -- in "reluctant defense of Pat Robertson" -- that what Pat Robertson actually said may have been misinterpreted. I haven't seen a transcript or heard audio of Robertson's remarks, but I wanted to pass along that caveat from a smart and reliable source. Whether Robertson's words in this instance have been unfairly misconstrued, I think we can all appreciate the wisdom of Horace Jeffery Hodges' observation in the comments: "Pat Robertson is God's way of reminding us that Jerry Falwell is sane."

Update II: Scrappleface has more.

4 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

What a freakin' idiot.

January 05, 2006 3:37 PM  
Blogger Horace Jeffery Hodges said...

Pat Robertson is God's way of reminding us that Jerry Falwell is sane.

Jeffery Hodges

* * *

January 05, 2006 9:54 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

The New York Times reported today that two left-leaning Washington organizations, People for the American Way and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, each have a staffer who monitors Pat Robertson's show every day. They alert the media when he says something outrageous.

Maybe I'm just out of it, but is Pat Robertson still such a big influence among the "religious right" that it's worthwhile for his opposition to monitor him? For years now, I've assumed he was pretty much a has-been.

January 07, 2006 8:09 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Interesting story, Jeff. I wonder the same thing you do about Pat Robertson. My impression has been that he's not that influential except for a fairly small faction of the religious right. But doesn't his organization still make a lot of money?

Anyway, I'll remember that story the next time a "liberal" howls about Michael Moore being portrayed as the face of the Democratic party.

January 07, 2006 11:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


"You underworld types hurt my feelings. I'm your buddy. Aren't you supposed to be picking on the tough-on-crime conservative down the block?

This Washington Post report on robbery victim and former D.C. mayor Marion Barry has been making the rounds.

Do people really think this way?

"There is a sort of an unwritten code in Washington, among the underworld and the hustlers and these other guys, that I am their friend," Barry said at an afternoon news conference in which he described the robbery in detail. "I don't advocate what they do. I advocate conditions to change what they do. I was a little hurt that this betrayal did happen."

5 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Outrageous, as anything concerning this guy is certain to be.
Before Spy magazine went out of business, they published the transcript of the sting that sent him to prision. It was classic.

January 05, 2006 11:00 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

"... among the underworld and the hustlers and these other guys, that I am their friend"

Jeff, you can confirm this, right? Didn't I see you helping Marion with his groceries last week?

January 05, 2006 12:55 PM  
Blogger Jeff said...

The bigger scandal involving Barry occurred back in October and was largely overlooked by the press: the former Mayor-for-Life hadn't paid taxes for eight years. The feds negotiated a plea with him that allowed him to keep his job on the city council.

In the paper today: A Barry aide moves the Martin Luther King, Jr., Day parade from January 16 to April--and then Barry himself balks when he sees that the date is April 1...

January 05, 2006 7:47 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Jeff, Jeff, Jeff. What taxes? He's hardly made any money the last 8 years since he stopped taking bribes. Oops. I mean, since he, um, found God? No, wait. He was broken up over the breakup of marriage #4 and then there was that cancer thing, well, who can remember to pay taxes with all that happening. You know what drugs do to your memory.

January 06, 2006 2:04 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

And that April Fool's thing? Old news. Once the WashPost made fun of their choice (it's just too darn cold for Barry to attend a MLK parade in January), the ward 8 group changed it to April 8. Oops. Conflicts with the Cherry Blossom parade. Now what? Why didn't Marty think ahead and get himself born in June, when there are no federal holidays?

January 06, 2006 2:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Hollywood's Message to Fly Over America

The message of Brokeback Mountain will be delivered by Jon Stewart. Stewart is a left leaning host of the Daily Show, known best for taking on Carson Daly, who is going to host the Oscars. I can say one thing in favor of this choice. . at least he isn't Whoopie Goldberg.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


"What Is History. . . .

. . . but a fable agreed upon." This Napoleon quote is found in Jonah Goldberg's take on Sacco and Vinzetti, George Clooney, and the general subject of Leftist myth making in this fine op-ed piece.

3 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

That's a good one, Stewdog.

Can I confess something? Until a few days ago, *I* thought Sacco and Vanzetti were innocent.

January 05, 2006 10:35 AM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Of course you did. That is because it was the myth that was spread, which became the fable agreed upon, which became history.

January 05, 2006 11:02 AM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Sacco and Vanzetti -- don't they make gelato? The mocha is excellent.

January 05, 2006 12:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Cheery reading for the New Year, or I read depressing books so you don't have to ...

I've read two books about grief and death since Christmas -- one, a gift from Scotty and Wonderdog (thanks, guys), was Booker prize winning novel The Sea, by John Banville, and the other was Joan Didion's The Year of Magical Thinking.

The Sea really bugged me. I've never read another John Banville novel, so I don't know whether this one is typical of his writing in general, but nothing irritates me more these days than a writer who has considerable gifts at his command who writes novels that function as elegant window displays for the considerable gifts at his command. The plot of the book, such as it is, finds middle-aged Max Morden retiring to a rented house by the sea, near the "chalets" where he spent his boyhood summers, to mourn his wife's death and think about the past. The first person account intercuts Max's memories of his wife's final months with his memories of a "significant" summer he spent by the sea, during which he became fascinated with the Graces, a family a rung or two higher on the social ladder than Max himself. I put "significant" in quotation marks, because I can't for the life of me figure out what's significant about Max's relationship with the Graces, other than the opportunity it affords Banville to display his considerable gifts, and -- what's worse -- I can't even fathom what's significant about his wife's death other than the opportunity it affords Banville . . . well, you get the idea. The premise of the novel seems to be "Hey, look at me, everybody, I'm the 'heir to Nabokov.' The back of the book says so. And besides, my book is filled with Beautiful Prose." The linking of Banville's name with Nabokov on the back of the book does Banville a considerable disservice. I kept expecting withering satire and a devastating prose style (Banville is good, but he's not that good), and all I got was the narrator's tendency to pepper his recollections with big, bloated words.

"Character-driven" novels are not of themselves a bad thing. Perhaps my favorite novel of the last thirty years relies more on character than on plot. If you're going to rely on character, however, you'd better make sure your characters are at least one, and preferably all, of the following: a) sympathetic; b) compelling; c) more than merely a place marker for inflated, if not particularly profound, ruminations on the Big Questions.

One of Banville's passages may illustrate what bothers me most about this book. In the passage, Morden describes the photographs his terminally ill amateur-photographer wife has taken of fellow hospital patients -- all of whom have, apparently cheerfully, consented to expose their scars, wounds, and afflictions for the sake of . . . photographic immortality? . . . the gratification of their exhibitionist desires? . . . the betterment of mankind? I got stuck, as I read this passage, trying to figure out why the people in the photographs had agreed to present their private suffering in so public a fashion. Then I realized they were props, placed on stage to be rearranged and remarked upon, to give the leading man something to do while he wows us with his method acting. Oh, come on, one might object, isn't Yorrick's skull a prop? Of course, but it's not merely a prop. We admire Hamlet's ability to make him live again, but that's just it. He makes him live again. Nobody really lives in Banville's novel, including his narrator, and perhaps that's not surprising in a novel that is mostly about death. What's more surprising, though, is that, for all his lovely style, Banville leaves us with very little impression that anyone in this book ever really has lived.

In the book's final passages, Max Morden likens the moment of his wife's death to a moment in his childhood when he had been lifted up by a suddenly surging sea, carried toward shore a bit, and then set down again. It was, he says, "as if nothing had happened. And indeed nothing had happened, a momentous nothing, just another of the great world's shrugs of indifference." That's what it feels like to read The Sea.

The Year of Magical Thinking ends with an image of the swelling sea as well:

I think about swimming with [John] into the cave at Portugese Bend, about the swell of the clear water, the way it changed, the swiftness and power it gained as it narrowed through the rocks at the base of the point. The tide had to be just right. We had to be in the water at the very moment the tide was right. We could only have done this a half a dozen times at most during the two years we lived there but it is what I remember. Each time we did it I was afraid of missing the swell, hanging back, timing it wrong. John never was. You had to feel the swell change. You had to go with the change. He told me that. No eye is on the sparrow but he did tell me that.


That's nice, I think. It's at least an image of Didion's life with her husband (writer John Gregory Dunne), and while it is certainly suggestive of larger themes and interpretations, it doesn't defer to them.

To be honest, I was prepared to dislike this book. I hate to admit that, since it's an account of the year Didion spent grieving for her husband and tending to her gravely ill daughter. It's a sad subject, made even sadder by the knowledge that Didion's only child died shortly after the book was finished. I suppose there are two reasons I wanted to dislike it. While I doubted that the book itself would be exploitive or sensationalistic, I thought Didion must surely be aware that there would be a ready-made market for a book like hers -- even people outside literary circles would be curious to find out how the well-known writer dealt with the sudden death of her well-known writer husband. I thought Didion, who famously remarked upon the writer's tendency to always be "selling someone out," should have refused to offer it for public consumption. Wasn't there something unseemly, I thought, about her willingness to dissect her grief? Wasn't there something self-absorbed about it? But that's insufferably, and even hypocritically, high-minded of me. Writers are inevitably self-absorbed -- even writers of shabby little blogs. Didion is a writer, a very good one. Why not write about one of her life's most important events?

Now let me try to explain the other reason I was reluctant to like this book. I had for some years been a great admirer of Didion's style, and I still am, I suppose. She is a master of detachment, a virtuoso of the flat affect. She has an unerring eye for the details of place and time, a fine ear for dialogue which juxtaposes the bizarre and the prosaic to achieve a kind of conversational surrealism. Recently, however, without actually rereading any of Didion's books, I have wondered whether her style wasn't a triumph of attitude over meaning. I was prepared to dislike The Year of Magical Thinking because of a kind of anticipatory disillusionment, an expectation that my suspicions about Didion's prose would be confirmed.

And I still haven't said anything about the book itself. It's a good book, a clear-eyed, almost clinical depiction of grief and its disorientations and disjunctions. If it resists the assignment of meaning, it doesn't embrace meaninglessness. Instead, it recognizes how heartbreakingly human it is to seek meaning, to view our lives with a writer's eye, and to treat the events of our lives as "authored," whether we actually believe them to be or not.

1 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

I read a number of Joan Didion's books when in college and I respect her tremendously as a writer, although I am not in lock step with her politics. Funny that.

January 05, 2006 7:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, January 04, 2006


Ouch

Just watched in horror as USC folded in the last six minutes to allow Texas to beat them for the national championship. Ouch. It was pretty painful. The funny thing is, I have no real affiliation with USC. I didn't go to school there and, quite frankly, I don't have anyone close to me who did (well one or two went there but moved on to another institution). However, growing up in southern California, I rooted for them as a kid and have lived and died with them my whole life. The (not so) recent departure of my beloved Los Angeles Rams has made my bond with SC all the more passionate these days given that they're the only football team remaining in L.A. that my childhood took in its whimsical stride.

Like a child, I've cheered them when they've won in recent years. Like a child, I know nothing but sadness with this loss.

I haven't felt a sports sting like this in a long time. Oy the pain. However, I intend to pretend it didn't happen. I'll read no sports pages, listen to no sports talk radio, watch no ESPN for at least a week. This did not happen. I intend to make it so.

4 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

Okay, I feel your pain, bro. I almost posted a taunting response to your cri de coeur, which consisted of the game's score in huge type, but I thought better of it. You'll note, however, that I was sorely tempted, given how you wallowed in the Notre Dame defeat.

Actually, I was totally for SC. But Topdog, our younger bro, and I predicted that if Texas got the ball back, their quarterback was going to win the game for them. That's why I agreed that they should have gone for it on 4th and 1, but Carroll called a lousy play.

January 04, 2006 10:38 PM  
Blogger Wonderdog said...

Thanks for going easy, KM. I probably deserved it after my Notre Dame taunts.

I disagree that Carroll's 4th and 1 was a lousy play call. They hadn't stopped LenDale all night and I felt sure he could get a yard in that situation. The bottom line is, they made the plays they had to and SC choked it a little bit.

January 04, 2006 11:47 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

Great Game
Bad call going for it at 4th at (wasn't it closer to 2?) in THAT field position with THAT quarterback.
Reggeie Bush' faux pas earlier in the game turned it around.
Too bad they allowed a TD that wasn't.
USC, you done been hooked.
Great Game.

January 05, 2006 7:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Waaa!..WAAAAA!!!! Stop your crying you Trojan suck up...They lost. And they lost to a better team, no matter WHAT that idiot Matt Lienert says. Vince Young showed why HE should have won the Heismen last night ladies and gentlemen. ( Hey Nice game Reggie..) The decision to go on 4th and 2 was the absolute right one..and they had the absolute right player executing it. LenDale White was the only player who showed up for SC on offense last night...he just didn't make it. Don't blame Pete Carrol, Pat the Texas Defense on the back and accept it. They were beaten fair and square, and TEXAS is # 1 End of story.

January 05, 2006 10:43 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Cheer up

Mark Steyn predicts the end of the Western world as we know it.

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

Interesting. I like him when I have heard him on Hugh Hewitt. Ask him if he can do cliff notes on his articles.

January 04, 2006 3:23 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Gads. We should've had more kids.

KM, back to work. Scotty & WD, nice work. How about another? SD, get those puppies of yours married and having kids already. Time's a wasting.

January 04, 2006 6:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Concert Fallout

A planned New Year's music festival in downtown LA, the Giant Village, was cancelled, ostensibly because of rain. Many of the disappointed revelers are threatening suit, suggesting that it was cancelled because of poor ticket sales. My favorite story to come out of it is a fellow who travelled all the way from England. He is devastated because he didn't get to propose to his girlfriend during a performance -- wearing a squirrel costume.
OK. . please. . get a grip. .and get a life.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 03, 2006


A Good Read

I am halfway through Mother Angelica and am greatly enjoying it. A tremendous life's story, well told.

4 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

That's interesting: I've seen Mother Angelica on EWTN for years, but I'd had no idea that the network was primarily her creation.

January 03, 2006 4:42 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Thanks for the recommendation, Stewdog. You're all going to laugh at me, but I don't think I've ever heard of Mother Angelica. I'm going to buy the book, though.

January 03, 2006 5:00 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

I believe that I first heard of the book on Laura Ingram, or Hugh Hewitt. While I was visiting my parents in the desert last week it was out. I picked it up and took off with it. I had never seen her or heard of her, but I am one "lapsed Catholic" who is enthralled by her story. I think my favorite tid bit is how she got the old "Dons" from her Italian neighborhood in Canton, Ohio to donate labor to the sisters. Classic.

January 03, 2006 9:08 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

I read her "Answers" book years ago. My favorite story -- and the only part I remember -- was about acquiring land she needed for her network. After several unsuccessful attempts to buy a certain parcel of land, she prayed hard for an answer and got one. Next time she meets with the owner, she asks him to give her the land. He does.

I've never seen Mother Angelica or EWTN -- no cable -- but from her writing she sounds like quite a character.

January 04, 2006 4:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Not That There Is Anything Wrong With It

Larry David checks in on Brokeback.

1 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

I'm with Larry. No way I'd see that movie. Even if I did go to movies. Which I don't.

January 03, 2006 1:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


"Cast Me Not Off in Old Age"

Via Stanely Kurtz at The Corner, here's an outstanding article in Commentary about the social and ethical challenges we face as an aging population.

2 Comments:

Blogger stewdog said...

I think Peter Pan had the best solution regarding aging.

January 03, 2006 12:35 PM  
Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Excellent piece, KM. Gives me much to think about. It really isn't as black and white as many would like to believe. Ugh. It's only going to get worse as the self-important boomers reach old age. Soylent Green in 2016?

January 04, 2006 6:13 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Of gay cowboys and real men ...

Ross Douthat reviews Brokeback Mountain favorably. His take on the movie coincides partly with Dale Carpenter's, who argues that the film buys into an image of homosexuality as an escape from the entanglements and burdens of domestic life.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Happy now, Wonderdog?

The Buckeyes did, in fact, "beat those lousy Irish."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Random Thoughts

Remember Lovable Lyle? I used to love the Lyle books when I was young, and whenever I've recalled Lovable Lyle as an adult, I've had a vague sense that the books taught a nice lesson about prejudice and "not judging a book by its cover." But, in another of the alarmingly numerous signs that I'm turning into a grumpy old coot, the last time I thought about the Lyle books, I began to wonder if the books weren't unthinkingly against prejudice. After all, not all prejudices are hateful and irrational. Come on, would you let your child have a huge talking Crocodile as a playmate? In fact, there are several categories of people that it would be quite reasonable for me to be prejudiced against as playmates for my children.

I suppose it's silly to expect a bit more nuance in a children's book, but by the time children reach high school, I think they're ready for some counter-narratives as an anitdote to the litany of poisonous platitudes they've imbibed since kindergarten. I've delved into the follow your heart phenomenon elsewhere, but I think the ever-popular you can't judge a book by its cover deserves some scrutiny and scorn as well. When I taught at a Catholic all-girls middle school and high school, the administration always had to issue warnings about Halloween costumes that wouldn't be permitted on the day the girls dressed up for Halloween (they had to be warned not to come as pregant nuns, for instance). One of the styles of costume that was verboten was "gangsta" fashion. Several girls complained to me during a homeroom that the anti-"gangsta" directive was needlessly restrictive, that they didn't mean to endorse a particular lifestyle by dressing in such a fashion, that they merely liked the way it looked, and, besides, you can't judge someone by their style of dress. I walked over to the chalkboard and drew a big swastika on the board. "What if," I asked, "I walked into class tomorrow morning wearing this symbol on my shirt because I thought it looked pretty?" That pretty much shut them up, as a well-placed reductio ad absurdum is wont to do with high school kids. They didn't even bother to ask me whether I was suggesting some equivalence between "gangsta" style and Nazi "style," which I wasn't. My point was to get them to stop believing, or pretending to believe, that the manner in which they presented themselves in public mattered only to themselves.

Ooops, it seems I've started the New Year out on a sour, rambling, incoherent note. Forget everything I just said.

Here's my amended New Year's message to one and all: follow your heart.

3 Comments:

Blogger Conservative in Virginia said...

Geez, KM, you caved awfully quickly. And just when I was about to welcome you into the Grumpy Old Coot club.

Just wait till your little princess wants to do something awful and says, "But Mom! I have to follow my heart!"

CIV
member, GOC of VA

January 03, 2006 1:41 PM  
Blogger stewdog said...

OK, you started with Children's books so I'll just pick up on that thread. One of my favorite series of Children's books was Good Dog Carl, about a precocious Rottweiller. There were others in the series. The drawings, and sense of humor and wonder made these special. Have either of the princesses been exposed to them?

January 03, 2006 3:18 PM  
Blogger Kate Marie said...

Fear not, CIV. My "follow your heart" was ironic, in the best tradition of the grumpy old coot club. Didn't they tell you that when they taught you the secret handshake?

Stewdog, the girls used to love the Good Dog, Carl books!

January 03, 2006 4:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 02, 2006


The Last Day

Today marks the last day of an 11 day year end respite. Started out crazy with Christmas cooking for the family. . . then a short trip to the desert. . and then a couple of days of hiding from the world in my coccoon. But tomorrow, I must dip my toes in the muddy waters of the real world once again. Alas and alack. . . at least my batteries are recharged and I have a Thursday Hockey Outing to ease the transition. No malls and no movie theaters this break, but I did rent a few movies and Stew's Reviews follow:

March of the Penguins: I am probably the last mammal on the planet to witness this exquisite jewel. Perhaps the best nature documentary ever filmed. Beauty in the cinematography and the story. I used to think that "Penguins" was a lame name for a hockey team, but after seeing the perseverence, patience, and grit of these Emperors of Antarctica, the name yields only honor and stature.

The 40 Year Old Virgin: Sorry critics, but I am not in line with the heaping of praise on this uneven turkey. I love Steve Carrell, and there were some good elements here, but the movie doesn't hold up as a whole, and the first half is embarassing at times.

Bewitched: The Critics savaged this film, but I am one of the few who actually enjoyed it. Part of my pleasure is how much I loved the old show, but mainly, I loved it because Nicole Kidman is just sooooo damned cute in it. She really shows that she is a throwback to the old time actresses of Hollywood. Will Ferrell is weak and miscast, Shirly MacLane is HORRIBLE, the script is uneven , but there is one great part in addition to Nicole's, that of Steve Carell playing Paul Lynde playing Uncle Arthur. I don't expect anyone else to like this movie, but I did!

Back to checking the Casa for water. Man, I feel sorry for the Rose Parade People.

1 Comments:

Blogger Kate Marie said...

Good luck taking the plunge back into ordinary existence, Stewdog. Looking forward to seeing you this week. And thanks for Stew's Reviews. Maybe I'll try Bewitched, since I'm a fan of the old show (though the post-Dick York ones aren't quite as good), and I like Nicole Kidman, too.

January 03, 2006 1:23 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home